I was wondering today if dating a man with a higher none signature will create an equilibrium in a white woman’s neurotransmitters which dulls her sensitivity so that only higher none individuals get her aroused. I have to believe that a least a grain of truth is in this. If a woman dates a man with a higher none signature, i.e. a black male, she is more likely to find black males disproportionately attractive in the future if she had a positive experience with the first black male.
Now, of course, much of this is culturally influenced. I think the culture backs this idea up, though. Typically women who will respond well to higher concentrations of none are sexually aware and uninhibited/less inhibited. Perhaps I’m confusing causation with correlation here, but I tend to think that a woman sexually confident enough to date outside of her race (still not completely accepted in society) will become used to a higher none signature in a mate and will be more likely to seek out the same in the future.
As I have noticed myself, a friend C tends to respond favorably well to IJ and I can only wonder if the fact that she has a mixed race boyfriend has something to do with it and will continue to affect her life after her current relationship has ended. Does this seem completely off the walls to you guys? Has anybody seen any similar correlations that may be attributed to none dependency/desensitization?
Hmm it is an interesting theory but I think you’re basing too many assumptions on race alone. . . (yes I know there is correlation to higher none signature, I’m not refuting that) I have dated every racial variant on earth (and a few I would swear were from other planets) I have dated black men, including one LTR. . . I think attraction for me is very much on a case by case basis. I think that women who are willing to “break rules” might indicate willingness to entertain more variety in her dating choices than just race. (You started by thinking outside the box, why would you just pick a different box?) Incidentally my (almost) fiance is GASP white.
Whether or not a woman is stuck with that attraction to a higher none signature, I don’t know. But there definitely has to be some type of trigger, a conditioned response to the stiumli of high none, especially if as you said she had a positive experience.
The woman I am currently dating on and off has dated a variety of men. But its funny now that I think about it, she’s gone from white, to hispanic, to black and at one time or another said she would only date black men from that point on.
She does respond favorably to IJ + Cops as did a few other women in my past. But there is something a bit different. I’ve gone really high on NPA and got no reaction, no ghosting either, just nada, zilch. And then another day, I wore like 3 sprays of IJ and she put up a physical barrier between us when out…as in the form of another person. I don’t even think she was consciously aware of it.
But when I get it right, I can see it hit her. Her leg starts to tremble a bit like she’s antsy, she’ll smoke a few extra cigs than normal and if I go in for the kill just right all is fine in our world. But if I act hesitant in anyway, it gives the whole process a creepy vibe.
I don’t about that…but IME…black and latin women respond more “outwardly” to a high none signature around me here in the city. White women, seem to hide it, even though they might be getting aroused.
There have been plenty of discussions surrounding this, and most have concluded that race is not the only factor in determining to find a mate.
Remember that cultural upbringings and societal norms just prevent the outward reaction to higher -none signatures, like hap tap said. There are more variables to consider than just -none output.
Oh absolutely, culture plays a huge role in the response of women especially the shown response. I’m wondering if once that barrier is broken and the woman is willing to outwardly display responses to high none she adjusts to the higher none and gets used to it.
Say white woman #1 shows no outward responses to higher none, but like most women she does respond. For reasons not necessarily related to pheromone production, she falls in love and dates a black male for three years before the relationship ends. Over the course of those three years she has both become used to his higher none signature and is comfortable displaying attraction to a man with higher none.
Now, my question is: is she more comfortable displaying attraction to a man with higher none because she has now displayed attraction to a higher level and has no subconscious/physiological rejection of a higher none signature, or does she now have a higher tolerance to none and needs around the same level (at least for a period of time) in order to feel effects of none, or neither of the above?
I would say she could become more comfortable around high none signatures in general however pheromones are just a small percent of what constitutes attraction so she may or may not display that preference.
No I dont believe she has a higher tolerance and needs the same level to get the signal anone sends. I think she just prefers the higher level now due to perhaps conditioning recognition or familiarity of the signature.
Studies have shown women who grow up with an abusive father (most likely high anone sig) tend to end up in abusive relationships even when the man never shows signs of being abusive in the beginning. They tend to fall prey to one abusive partner after another. This is not because they are attracted to abusive men its because they are familiar with the signature and conditioned to respond to it.
I suppose it could work the other way as well. If she has a relationship with a male with high anone (race has little to do with it) and its a wonderful experience then this could condition her response to it.
Its a good question though without any real concrete answer from science just yet.
Tisha
Real quick note - I am Sicilian and Irish, I have a very high natural none output. I can OD on a spray of ammo some days.
Race and statistics have little to do with it.
I will use my current situation as an example…
It is safe to say that my current GF likes high -none sigs regardless of her past experiences. It is just that there is more to it than just that sig alone. Her brain is directly tied to her vagina like they say guys think with their member and not their brains 
She is however still in need of that P74 and IH type comfort and that is what seals the deal. Yes high -none peaks her interest but in the long run it’s the comfort that keeps the relationship going.
You have her last 2 LONG TERM relationships with guys in my estimation that had high -none sigs and she got into these relationships thinking that this sig is what a man is supposed to be and realized that there is technically more to it. Then you have me and my A314, P90, Ammo Heavy and IH sig (and a dash of congruency 
) and she realizes even though -none got her interested that the whole package is what she was truly looking for. She has told me she has never known this type of happy EVER before.
I really believe you can’t help what your attracted to subconsciously. The thing is for long term success there is just way more to it than your phero sig natural or synthetic. YOU STILL NEED TO BE A GOOD PERSON.