Do you think it’d be possible to create a pheromone for resetting someone’s opinion about you?
All of my friends (especially females) are always complaining about how they can’t get friends in their environment because their past friends influence the others about how the person is, or they did something stupid and came off a certain way, or even the infamous problem of being too nice so they become a booty call rather than a girl with a “spark”.
The last one keeps coming up with my girl friends. Both of them were told that “there just isn’t that spark”. It makes sense to me that they were told that because they put out easily instead of keeping the so called “love game” alive.
I know we have pheromones that can make people space out, but is there one that could give a completely new beginning to people?
TAF has been discussed as being the ideal pheromone for exactly what you are seeking. “See me again for the first time.”
It would probably be worth your time to do some searches on TAF. WARNING: You’ll get a lot of hits and most of them won’t be relevant to this topic, so you’ll want to allocate some time to refining your searches.
I don’t recall reading brilliant success stories so much as theoretical discussions. If you make this work, please share a detailed report with us! I think it should work with people. In doing housework, TAF definitely causes one to notice clutter and dirt which normally go unnoticed because one has grown accustomed to them over time. I think of TAF as a dishabituator.
the only way to “re-set” someone’s opinion of you that I know of is to disappear for a while (a month or six weeks is enough) then come back into that person’s life and behave completely differently. Like you’re a different person. The other person will try to behave towards you as if you were the old person, but with a consistent change in your behaviour it will re-set their opinion of you.
Wearing a phero mix which is congruent with the person you want to be seen as would probably help speed the process.
With repeated exposure to pheromones and congruence with them yes over time they can change a persons perspective of you.
Congruence is key here though. For instance suppose someone thinks your a bitch. Just applying Ishine wont change that thought. It will make them feel more at ease, happy, uplifted, comfortable etc etc… when around you. Over time that association will be implanted in there subconscious. However if your actually acting like a bitch this effects the conscious mind and they end up going with that conscious thought. “gee she seemed nice but she is just a bitch”
If I guy says there is no spark pheromones can enhance that spark but your actions are what ignite it into a flame.
I have not seen resetting of emotion or thought just with pheromones alone. It takes an all round effort really. TAF in my opinion just intensifies and focuses them in on what is already there so if they think badly of the person it will intensify that as well unless you make a conscious effort to change all the forms in which you communicate. Pheromone communication is just a small part of how we interact. You need to bring your verbal, body language and pheromonal signals all in line and balance to change a persons perspective of you.
There’s a general clear liquid inhalational anesthetic that causes amnesia and destroys the will to resist persuasion that the CIA and the plumbers have been using for years.
Ever notice that beautiful girls can fall in love with really ugly men and marry them? If you get them to kiss you, starting from friendly, then onward and upward through the bases, etc. That’s the natural way, but there is a pheromonal shortcut that doesn’t involve illegal drugs. Indeed, you are carrying the perfectly legal drugs on you right now. Read my new book:
Of Love
KISSES PASS EPIGENETIC
PHEROMONES
IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF
SOCIOPATHY, ‘MENTAL ILLNESS’ AND
DISEASE
Library of Congress Control Number: 2009943497
ISBN 978-0-9815226-1-6
The CIA and plumbers ? I am assuming this is a unnatural drug of sorts.
Pheromones signal, thats all they do. They do not take away a persons free will. Science has proven this already and although we do emit pheromones when we kiss they do not blind a person to the other factors related to attraction. I cant say that I agree with any of the theories in your book. But you have the right to have those theories.
You are Bubba Nickolson correct ? The man who claimed Star wars was written about him.
The healthy adult male facial skin surface lipids do release people and give them a fresh start (not exactly what the question to start this thread was about), but free will is there and addicts have the choice to go back to it if they want of their own free will. Most of us grant that people with ongoing addictions to non-pheromonal addictive substances are more inclined to choose another dose over abstinence, so there are degrees of free will. Someone who has just had his fiftieth injection of morphine can have the free will to quit, but endurance of withdrawal symptoms lies ahead.
We only have anecdotes so far so there is a diminishing chance (still a real one) that this could all be fancy and wishful thinking, but of those with drug addictions to heroine and crack cocaine who used the home remedy pheromone in open trials where they knew exactly what it was they were taking have broken free immediately and not chosen to ingest the same substance to which they were addicted.
The general anesthetic and glue concoction used to ‘reset’ other people after you have committed criminal acts upon them for which you do not wish to be arrested for is synthetic, but based upon natural substances with nearly the same effects. The use is empirical, so we really do not know how general anesthetics work, although it seems likely that they swell up the Schwann/oligodendritic capacitors whose serial discharge is saltative conduction, rendering them ineffectual.
Yes, filming Star Wars was my idea in 1972. The main plot comes from a 1963 novella that has been removed from most libraries, it’s title: The Star War. I knew Steve Spielberg in Texas during the McGovern campaign, my bad.
My new human pheromones book:
OF LOVE KISSES PASS EPIGENETIC PHEROMONES IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF
SOCIOPATHY, ‘MENTAL ILLNESS’ AND DISEASE copyright 2009 all rights reserved is available on google and on Amazon dot come for $1.00–but you have to have a Kendall reader, the PC program is free on Amazon. The ISBN number is 9780981522616, the Library of Congress Control Number is 2009943497. If you’d like to read about my teenage ‘adventures in the surreal’ check out my last year book on Amazon or Google booksearch:
HILLARY’S ANGEL, copyright 2008 all rights reserved Library of Congress Control Number: 2008900636 ISBN 9780981522609
Yes Pheromones to play a roll in mate selection but I dont agree that they do to the extent your claiming. We are humans and do not act on purely instinct or pheromonal signaling. We are a bit more advanced then other mammals.
Steven Spielberg was 12 years old during the McGovern campaign and grew up in New Jersey and Arizona. Editted to say… Opps my bad I believe he was 26 not 12, got my campaigns mixed up not sure how old when he started filming. I never was a fan myself.
I mean no offence to you but I care about the new people coming in and learning the truth about pheromones. There is enough bull crap out there and misconceptions from marketers and I hate to see more misconceptions being created with information that has not been proven at least to some extent scientifically by a accredited lab.
Steven Spielberg could have been 12 years old. It was at least as likely as his being 24. He looked 17.
Actually, we humans are just animals with extras. The more animals are social, the more they use pheromones. Our number and receptivity for pheromones is unquestionably an order of magnitude greater than any other animal. The big extra is foresight, which allows us to cry when we part company with loved ones. I’ve basically written a book on each of these subjects. I am sorry you are having trouble finding them on Amazon and Google Booksearch, but they are there.
This one you pretty much got from everyone else’s abstracts with pheromones. My opinion differs greatly when we move in treating medical conditions some which are genetic and can in no way be treated with pheromones. You give them way more power then they could ever live up to. So we will just have to agree to disagree and that is fine. As long as the new people are aware of what is going on.
This one you pretty much got from everyone else’s abstracts with pheromones.
Wow, you couldn’t be more wrong. I’ve written and published four medical journal articles on human pheromones, been interviewed by BBC-TV science programs, CBC, Omni, Discover, Popular Science, La Mond, Der Spiegle, presented papers to learned societies here and abroad, and I’m generally regarded as the most original creative thinker in the field. It was I who suggested that pheromones and recognition of human pheromones was behind sexual orientation, proven true. It was I who suggested conformational change in pheromone receptor proteins on pheromone-receptor protein interaction, proven true; and again suggested ionic sequestration by pheromone receptor proteins, again proven true. Sure they laughed at me about all those things and more. Over twenty seven years nothing in my articles, papers, or my new book has been disproven and much has been already demonstrated to be spot on correct.
I have read carefully thousands of medical journal articles and listened to hundreds of talks presented by colleagues in the field, and trust me, this field interests a lot of silly knuckleheads. I am not one of them, however.
My work derives from a bare bones economic model of human and animal behavior that has been amazingly consistent and accurate. For some unknowable reason, the other chemists, physiologists & physicians in this field have never studied economics and know virtually nothing about it. Of course the psychologists just dream up explanations willy nilly, paying almost no attention to evolution, embryology, or even reality.
The real test is just that, testing. After reading my book, you can go out and buy three packs of chewing gum and literally cure a heroine addict or a juvenile delinquent. I have done it repeatedly. Soon enough double-blind cross over clinical trials will get under way and I will be proven correct yet again. Equations don’t lie, or at least they haven’t yet.
Now if you are through with your personal attacks against me, I can answer specific questions about pheromones.
I am not attacking you. I said I dont agree with you and I do have that right. I said we would just have to agree to disagree.
I have seen your book and your 4 articles and I and I have come to the conclusion there is no question about pheromones you can answer for me. If I think of one, I will let you know
Seeing and reading with comprehension are two entirely different things. (Besides one of my articles is in press, so you couldn’t have even seen it. So that makes you an outrageous liar.)
Perhaps you would consider erasing your slanderous posts, now? A heartfelt, honest apology to the world’s greatest scientific genius is in order here. My book will raise all the prisons in this country after all, win the war on drugs and on crime, never mind its uplifting of education to new levels of brilliant achievement. That is, if you are done showing your backside to the world, of course.
Look Bubba I am not going to argue with you. I saw the 3 below and some other stuff you wrote and really didn’t pay much mind to it so it matters little whether its 3 or 4. But I have seen them. I will admit I said 4 above though and I apologize for thinking it was 4.
LOL! I’m in the world of academia and whilst I don’t have 3 journos yet I have to admit by academic standards your arrogance is unequal. And I’ve met some real arrogant stuck up profs and Docs who are also leaders in their field.
not sure how old when he started filming. I never was a fan myself.