I fully support PP. I had numerous great hits with just two sprays mixed with two drops of A314. I wish that Futurist start making the formula again or Androtics make some kinda deal to make it their own.
I tried asking this question with a new thread, but is Ammo similar to PP? The level of effects seem to differ and maybe because of different -none content. What I’m trying to say is effect from Ammo is more subtle and PP is much more obvious. I had success with two sprays of PP, but does this mean I need to use more sprays with Ammo? Or does it mean PP tends to blend with my body chemistry more so than Ammo? If anyone with experience with both products, please give me some feedback.
I think Ammo and PP are oft compared because they both smell the same, i.e., they use the same cologne component. However they’re really different animals. Ammo is tame, polite and sociable with a sensual undercurrent. PP is basically a big hard-on with a little buffering. It has 3 times the androstenone content and can be dangerous for certain users, e.g., those with ample androstenone production such as teens and young men. After drydown the stank of androstenone is highly evident. Really evident. It reaks. Funk city. Fartsville. Butt city. Ammo’s holy trinity stays cool, covered and perfumed. Perfect for boardrooms, business meetings and general walkaround.
I e-mailed him last week via his gmail addy. No response yet. A pity, as I wanted to try this product for shock value. From what I’ve read about it when it was in MX stage, it sounded like an awesome product.
I only hope that he takes this situation as a lesson in business and tries again, or, at least hire an attorney and sell the recipe before competitor’s can analyze the contents of the mix.
