Shape Changes In Aroma-producing Molecules Determine The Fragrances We Detect

I wonder if any of the pheromones/putative molecules are like Octanal - “Octanol is a structurally flexible molecule that can adapt to many different shapes by rotating its chemical bonds.” Perhaps if some are, we could have different effects or just different ‘scents detected’ depending on different shapes of the same molecule?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081222163053.htm

Shape Changes In Aroma-producing Molecules Determine The Fragrances We Detect

ScienceDaily (Dec. 26, 2008) — Shakespeare wrote “a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” But would it if the molecules that generate its fragrance were to change their shape?

That’s what Dr. Kevin Ryan, Assistant Professor of Chemistry at The City College of New York (CCNY) and collaborators in the laboratory of Dr. Stuart Firestein, Professor of Biology at Columbia University, set out to investigate. Their findings, reported December 22 in the journal “Chemistry & Biology,” shed new insight into how our sense of smell works and have potential applications in the design of flavors and fragrances.

When odor-producing molecules, known as odorants, pass through the nose, they trigger intracellular changes in a subset of the approximately 400 different varieties olfactory sensory neurons (OSN) housed in the nose’s internal membrane tissue, Professor Ryan explained. The unique reaction pattern produced, known as the olfactory code, is sent as a signal to the brain, which leads to perception of odors.

Professor Ryan and his team wanted to learn how these receptor cells respond when odorants change their shape. They studied the odorant octanal, an eight-carbon aldehyde that occurs in many flowers and citrus fruits. Octanal is a structurally flexible molecule that can adapt to many different shapes by rotating its chemical bonds.

The researchers designed and synthesized eight-carbon aldehydes that resembled octanal, but had their carbon chains locked by adding one additional bond. These molecules were tested on genetically engineered OSNs known to respond to octanal. This work was done in Professor Firestein’s laboratory at Columbia.

The aldehyde molecules that could stretch to their greatest length triggered strong activity in the OSNs. However, those molecules whose carbon chains were constrained into a U shape blocked the receptor and left the cell unable to sense octanal.

“Conformationally constrained odorants were more selective in the number of OSNs they activated,” Professor Ryan noted. “The results indicate that these odorant molecules might be able to alter fragrance mixture odors in two ways: by muting the activity of flexible odorants present in a mixture and by activating a smaller subset of OSNs than chemically related flexible odorants. This would produce a different olfactory code signature.”

Olfactory receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) class of proteins, a family of molecules found in cell membranes throughout the body. Professor Ryan pointed out that half of all commercial pharmaceuticals work by interaction with proteins within this family. Thus, the findings could also have applications to GPCR drug design, as well.
Adapted from materials provided by City College of New York.

Could what is going on here be similar to the cross-adaptation effect mentioned in the 1995 study below?

Could ‘bad smelling’ pheromones (like Androstenone) and putatives somehow have their perceived bad odor minimised through the use of structurally similar but nicer smelling molecules?

1: [Chem Senses.](javascript:AL_get(this, ‘jour’, ‘Chem Senses.’):wink: 1995 Aug;20(4):401-11.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/query/egifs/http:–highwire.stanford.edu-icons-externalservices-pubmed-custom-oxfordjournals_final.gif [Links](javascript:PopUpMenu2_Set(Menu8590025):wink:

Cross-adaptation of sweaty-smelling 3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid by a structurally-similar, pleasant-smelling odorant.

Pierce JD Jr (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term="Pierce%20JD%20Jr"[Author]&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus), Zeng XN (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term="Zeng%20XN"[Author]&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus), Aronov EV (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term="Aronov%20EV"[Author]&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus), Preti G (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term="Preti%20G"[Author]&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus), Wysocki CJ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=Search&Term="Wysocki%20CJ"[Author]&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_RVAbstractPlus).
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308, USA.
Cross-adaptation has been interpreted as a measure of the degree to which odors share common sensory channels. How structural similarity, in the absence of perceptual similarity, influences cross-adaptation is unknown. The present study assessed cross-adaptation by structurally similar, but perceptually different, odorants. Magnitude estimates for a 10:1 mixture of (E)- and (Z)-3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid (3M2H), a principal component of human underarm odor, decreased following adaptation to a mixture of (E)- and (Z)-ethyl esters of 3M2H (EE3M2H), which possess a pleasant, fruity odor. Cross-adaptation was asymmetric; adaptation to 3M2H did not significantly affect the perceived intensity of EE3M2H. By contrast, there was no significant cross-adaptation between 3M2H and the fruity-smelling ethyl esters of its homologues, 3-methyl-2-octenoic acid (EE3M20) and 3-methyl-2-pentenoic acid (EE3M2P). Similarity ratings revealed no differences among the three ethyl esters in their perceptual similarity to 3M2H (i.e. all were rated equally dissimilar to 3M2H). Molecular modeling studies revealed no difference in the charge distribution of these molecules. Rather, differences in the shape and size of the hydrophobic part of the molecule may determine the extent of cross-adaptation. These results demonstrate that structurally-similar, yet perceptually-distinct, odorants may cross-adapt and suggest that the extent of cross-adaptation may be affected by the degree of structural, as well as perceptual, similarity.
PMID: 8590025 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/7056948/description.html
“…Olfactory cross-adaptation (“cross-adaptation”) is another methodology for inhibiting the perception of malodor. Cross-adaptation is the decrease in the perceived odor sensitivity to one odorant after exposure to another odorant. Cross-adaptation has commonly been interpreted as a measure of the degree to which odors share common sensory channels. Although it has long been known that perceptual similarity influences cross-adaptation, recent evidence suggests that structural similarity, in the absence of perceptual similarity, can also influence cross-adaptation. **
Pierce et al., Chem. Senses, 20: 401 411 (1995); Pierce et al., J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 47: 363 375 (Dec. 1996). Pierce et al. report the cross-adaptation ofsweaty-smelling 3-methyl-2-hexenoic acid (3M2H) by its ethyl esters
…”**