Thanks for the advice guys, I’ll definitely take what your saying under consideration. I know there’s wisdom in what you’re saying. 
I’m worried that perhaps you guys took what I was saying about revenge a little to literal. I believe that succeeding is the best revenge. By that I guess I almost mean what you’re telling me? By succeeding no thought needs to be given to the person who wronged you, you can forget all about them. All you need to do is succeed and it comes back to bite them on the ass - they wished your downfall and now they have received the opposite. Satisfaction is to be had in this is it not? One can entirely let the incident go, wish the man well on his journeys, and go on to succeed. The man who wronged knowing ‘I have wished this guy’s downfall, would it not be great to see this guy fail’ can receive only strife when one succeeds in accomplishing one’s goals.
That’s all I meant
On a side note, is anyone here actually a Buddhist? Gone with the Wind your sig seems somewhat familiar. Anyway, I keep hearing this word Karma. In the long long term (if you’re spiritual) I see the benefit in the western interpretation of this. But by past experience, I’ve come to see that it largely just allows people to walk all over you - Especially in the competitive world of business which is my future field of vocation. The eastern interpretation (from whence the term came) however, is worth a good look in.
I spent roughly a year studying eastern religion, specifically Buddhism. I came to see that the actual meaning of ‘kamma/karma’ (pali/sanskrit) is not so entirely fatalistic as we are led to believe in the west, simply the law states as it was told that every action has a consequence. They teach that if you plant the seed of anger, you will grow an anger tree. But it is also said that not every seed that’s planted comes to fruition.
Let me illustrate my interpretation as such through a fictional example:
Let’s say I’m a manager of this MN firm - Johnny Smith has been falling behind in his productivity of late, in comparison to his efficiency and work output when he first began. Upon probing for any underlying emotional issues (family problems, marital, death, whatever) nothing is dug up. I then hound Johnny Smith up a bit for having what essentially seems to be a bit of a slack work ethic.
Does Johnny a: Realise the error of his ways, pick his guts up and work to the same level of his fellow employees?
Or b: Take what I’ve have told him impartially, as a personal attack, bottle up his anger and maraude off back to his office to let his disgruntled mood progress?
Truth be told, it would probably largely depend on how I handled the situation. But also it would probably have a lot to do with the kind of person Johnny Smith is. Up until that point I might have little understanding of the inner tickings of J. Smith, all I’m seeing is a lack in productivity without any suitable explanation.
When applied to the western interpretation of Karma, one would have to say telling off Johnny would come back to bite me on the ass. But what if Johnny took on board the message of what I was saying to him? What if he improved his work ethic and productivity and began pulling his weight as a consequence. Then again he might not, he might be caught slapping the thigh of a co-worker just next week, munching on an excessive amount of donuts, and losing that report I asked him to file.
Life just isn’t that fatalistic in my opinion. Every action is influenced by the consequences of a previous action, and every action taken has an effect - Who are we to say whether it will be good or bad? That is a matter of circumstance.
Kamma, every action has a consequence, cause and effect.
I’m gonna go slap on some A314
Regards & Respect
J