There’s been posts and suggestions as to how the format should go to help formalize things, and increase flow and readability, as well as help out the new and old.
Problem is that a lot of members first coming here will ask without knowing that they can likely use the search function above to pull up product information and reports as well as read into journals about individuals testings. But thats what we are here for, to answer new comers questions and then help direct them in the right direction and welcome them and provide them with the sense of the family atmosphere that emulates from the forums.
Without creativity, innovation would not be possible. Advocating for atmospheres that induce both, will always produce the best culture; and when one feels connected to that culture, one does not feel anxious in their relationship and can express themselves clearly without the thought of being subjected to judgement, criticism, and thus stifling creativity.
There is no one right way of doing anything because we are all different but some do find that planning or being standardized works for them, and other find it to be holding back their true form of presentation. Autonomy promotes creativeness.
You’d make a great bureaucrat! The more rules, the less thinking and imagination needed. Luckily this is a forum and not a government form, so, instead, we BS, debate, explain, rant 'n motomouth about mones ‘til the freakin’ cows come home!
I agree entirely. It also might be nice if there was a thread titled each molecule, and it was nothing but reports about it. No extra speculative posts or side things, or molecule suggestions to make it better, just the molecule reports. But individual (non combo) reports are hard to find and I like the side comments, speculation, and molecule suggestions, which one would only get if they redid the post in their own thread. So I’m not sure if it would in the end help things or not, but it would save a lot of searching. Perhaps it’s best that the searching not be saved though, as it always has to come down to testing it yourself as bias free as possible, so even if you can find more on the topic, it probably wouldn’t help you much anyways, and might hinder the new users who see a post about specific doses working foe one person and wondering why the exact same didn’t work for them.
Yeah I analogize everything. With exceptions to my journal which I try to make as as scientific as possible, When I do crazy mixes and off the chart testing i’ll usually go with a story line.
Thanks Steve for seeing it coming and keeping us from leading ourselves to the lions den as they say…
Ya after thinking about it, this forum is great the way it is. It’s really cool how great you guys are about keeping such an incredibly open atmosphere, thank you.