If you have a distinct impression of what P77 and P76 do at 2.5 mcg, I will try to confirm your impressions. Only one report on the board fits.
Maybe I should create a pheromone review site based upon Amazon’s book review format: star ratings, total ratings, narratives, most helpfuls.
http://www.pheromonetalk.com/a314-68707.html
Breakthrough. Jett was right. I think I know why social effects, self effects, room diffusers and mones on solid objects are different. Not just a guess. Several scientific sources. If true, revolutionary.
Admins: Please let’s close this thread, unless Watkins objects. He may continue it for his personal use.
Please make your printouts. I would like to delete this thread in two weeks.
Sounds good. Cite.
Delete or no delete, it will be archived.
Even better reason. Can we dispense with this entire sub-forum within which the thread is nested? To be clear: I own my words. I own my thoughts. I will not be discussing results or mix ideas. Once I’ve had an opportunity to evaluate P95, I will forward a report by email. That is all.
Whatever floats your boat, MMDI.
We have ideas@androtics.com and 800-671-6464 Opt 5 for a reason.
When I hear the signal, I’ll drop this into the archive. Watkins?
OK. Let it sit. I will think about it. God knows every word I write is such precious nectar. Not really. Not that interesting.
I saved a PDF archive, so y’all are free to archive this thread.
We should wipe the slate clean and invite more people. If you have a really good mix, I don’t want to know the makings. If it is good, make it a MX. What I would like Androtics to do is offer on a very limited basis a way for you to send me a bottle of your potion or vice versa for blind testing. Blind testing gets much better data and is actually fun. It gets rid of biases. So if we could do more blind testing, I would enthusiastically support that and adding a few new people. But the older posts were for an audience of only me, Watkins, and Androtics. Those posts must go.
