Tater would like to contribute one of his COMMANDO TACTICS. It’s called “The Indirection Play.” What’s that? Let’s say that you want attention from someone, but you just can’t get the time of day. Try as you might, there isn’t even a phero combination that works for that person.
Figure out the type of person that you’re able to have the strongest hit from. In particular, this should be a type that responds very well to a range of pheros on you and does NOT get offended by mass quantities in relatively close proximity to you. Now, I mean a TYPE, not just one person. And it has to be a RANGE of pheros, preferably a few base ingredients with accent pheros that kick in noticeable effects. Move through a sequence of as many accent pheros in combination with that base as you can manage. Keep this up for about three weeks. Zero pheros for 1 week. Then, do the exact opposite phero mix for 1 week (e.g. replace heavy EST with alpha-nol or TUTH). Watch what happens. Now, obviously, you need to be in your target’s presence for at least a few minutes, in somewhat close proximity.
Good…now do you want to know why it works? What a shame that I’m not telling in public.
Yes. Well, I would hope that your target would be somebody you have physical access to…unless you’re a psycho stalker freak. Tater’s only a certifiable psycho and hasn’t graduated to stalker freak yet.
(In my life at least) There are people I meet at regular intervals in time, like once a week or once a fortnight, could be a course you are doing together, or some other group activity… so I don’t think it would work for these people (as far as I can imagine).
Now as to why it works, phero-confusion? Is it the changing signature perhaps?
Tater had a few drops of Ammunition in a test vial hanging around. Tried it out with a little bit of cover. Amazing how well it works on women under 30. Don’t underestimate that one.
Phoenix…Tater always works with targets that you have some regular exposure to. My experiments have also shown that a LOT of the phero effect has to do with the pheros produced by the wearer in response to the phero, and the pheros emitted by the women who are responding to an artificial phero wearer. You know how having “woman” on you, even from hugging your mom or your sister, somehow makes you more attractive? Tater believes women emit some type of “desirable man nearby” signal when they react positively to a potential mate. There seems to be a related “competition” response that matches the menstrual cycle and determines whether a woman will become primed to be more desirable, and to eclipse the woman who is after the desirable man.
It’s a rather complex feedback mechanism, but if you think about it, it begins to make sense. Tater believes he has discovered the “desirable by association” factor.
Whew! After two long nights of reading, I’ve finally reached the end of the biscuit. This is a great journal and I’ve learned a lot from it. Thanks much Mr. Tater!
