Oh (((John))) LOL thats just it and what I have been trying to tell you. What I posted in post 9 didnt come from a negative place you read it from a negative place.
That’s what I meant when I said wear a happy face when you read it. Its something Jasmin taught me a long time ago because its hard sometimes to convey the meaning of something in writing without the visual cues.
I do appreciate your releasing something new. I do understand you can only make products with the molecules you have to work with. No where did I complain about IS/a being gone. Sure its disappointing that the molecule cant become available but I am not disappointed in you or AD. Its all been said in post 9.
My only concern was naming the new formula with the old formulas name and the confusion it can cause when people read reports or just pop into the store to restock and dont realize its not the same. People miss the little number on the bottom of the bottle and of course they cant see the bottom of the bottle until after they make the purchase. I was just suggesting to make it more obvious which is why I gave the examples like AMMO reloaded or IS/C. To make it stand out more. That’s it. I am not demanding you hunt down some TAL and remake anything or that you never change anything. I am not saying the new formula will not be good. I am just saying it should be more distinguished from the original for clarity’s sake. Plus I think changing the name slightly even if its just calling it IS/C makes it more exciting and people will buy it more.
Thank you for making a effort to hear what I was trying to tell you. 
Tisha
) so its difficult to tell your intentions.