I have seen a lot of different mixes and have thought and tried many myself. Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on when a mix gets to complicated. I tend to add more of the different products when I am going out and not sure what setting I will be in so I have all the bases covered, and now I am thinking it is not the best idea. Just curious more than anything what others think.
Scott
Mostly personal preference. I’m of a “simple” mind (and no comments from the peanut gallery on that!). Like the “grab and go” type things like Ammunition, although I often add a shot of Shine and/or IFM depending on situation.
If I recall Those-Who-Know have indicated that the best results seem to come from either a very simple combo, or a more complex “symphonic” combo. Sort of one extreme or the other.
Go with works for you. You can start simple and easy to get a hang of it, then add mix and match if you so desire later after you understand what the individual elements do.
My opinion.
When they stop working or getting results its too big… Otherwise things to consider is how much its costing you, and if a smaller mix may be more economical, particular if its a mix you want to use regularly… And, also, if the pheros are not long lasting (ie, alpha/betanol) then reapplying alot is also an inconvinience…
Plus:
Less is often more.
and
do you really want to have to go through the hassle of applying some complex mix everytime? For short term maybe it’s okay, but I sure don’t want to have to spend hours primping and tweaking every time.
Granted if you fine a working combo you can often make up pre-mixed batches for quick applications. But think of the cost/benefit ratios…
Just some thoughts
Some of the MX series are pretty complex all by them selves, if its complexity you are after, you may want to look into those.
Thanks for the great comments. Yeah I am leaning towards simpler mixes now. The big ones seem to get complicated and did not see the benefit that outwayed the work. Thanks again
Scott