An interesting homework assignment

Well not really an assignment per say. You see yesterday I posted a couple of times to a topic about copulin use vs outcome attachments/expectations and Tish brought up a point about men tending to only notice or at least focus more on attraction based hits and then usually only on women they themselves are attracted to.

This made me consider the possibility that the pheromones might be more effective since a lack of interest could be considered a DHV of sorts.
http://www.pheromonetalk.com/mens-pheromone-advice-tricks-tips/how-use-copulins-eow-48518.html

So I came up with a little pet project/idea. For the next couple of days I’d like to see you guys try out some of your attraction based products/mixes and make it a point to interact with and report the effects on women that you are NOT attracted to.
Now I don’t mean “unattractive women”. A woman can be very attractive and you just don’t feel that spark or whatever. The point is that these should be women that you can talk to and interact with while having no desires or outcome expectations regarding her feelings toward you. You should legitimately be indifferent as to whether or not the woman finds you attractive (outside of course the curiosity of observing the effects of the pheromones.)

I think that this would be a good exercise for your observational skills, as well as social intelligence at sensing the feelings of people across the board and not just focusing on people you want something from.
Besides which my theory is that it would be a lesson on the critical counter intuitive. I suspect that by wearing a good attraction product or mix, and being able to communicate in a confident and relaxed manner conveying no sexual interest will quite possibly result in more frequent and/or stronger hits than what you notice when actively trying to attract or seduce.

It’s kinda like how in those sappy teen romance movies, you have the lovable loser nerdy guy that’s head over heals for the hottest cheerleader in school…all the while he has an equally nerdy female best friend that’s crazy for him and he’s totally oblivious to it.

So how’s about helping me test my little theory here?

Sounds good, are you going to have a specific thread for people to post their reports?

This a TERRIFIC idea brought to you by RADMAN :slight_smile:. I’m excited to read some reports on this.

So wear our hard hitting attraction mixes, and watch the hits come from women we’re not interested in.

Are these women we already know or just somone randomly?

Sure, I’m in. The suitable products I have are:

  • TUTH
  • MX301
  • MX302
  • IJ?

I’m happily married, so have a pretty good perspective for this type of test in that, while I do want to be attractive, I have no intent to follow through (catch & release).

Wish I had some Panty Scorcher :smiley:

Although, I’ve got to admit, I’m laughing a little about the idea of women who are “not unattractive”, but I’m not attracted to them…

Shouldn’t matter :slight_smile:

But if we know them and aren’t interested and they know that, and have been exposed to those mixes, just curious on how you can establish that baseline.

Just wondering cause I’ve worn MX353 and some of the other stuff around women I know and haven’t really noticed anything.

Was gonna test MX334 on a few that I knew and see if I got something.

Yes, this works. I’ve got plenty of girls I’m not personally attracted to (no offense, of course) that are practically GLUED.

I try to be polite. :slight_smile:

It can or should be a mix of strangers and women you already know. As for the attractiveness, well I have female friends that are quite attractive but for whatever reason I have no romantic or sexual interest in them. I think a man can acknowledge that a woman is attractive without “wanting” her. But if it makes it easier try to focus on observing women that you find…plain.

Anything that gives me a reason to wear my IG/IJ/ P79/P93 combo again I’m game!!!:cool: