I did calculations for 10, 20, 30 and 40 mcg of TAC added to that mix and from 2 exposures to 24 exposures. TAC appears to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the original mix toward sex with this subject, and in only one case was sex indicated with enough certainty to say it was going to happen, and then only once, and after 8+ exposures.
Testing for 15, 25, 35 and 45 mcg TAC in the mix showed no significant sexual results.
Testing for 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mcg shows a good response at 7.5 mcg, with sex indicated after at least 8 exposures, and possibly again after another 16 to 20 more. The indications between them appear to indicate that there is a dampening effect from the TAC that produces a more loving response than sexual response, which allows her to become frightened by the sex and withdraw from repeating it, and even when there is strong attraction and intimacy later on, she prefers loving togetherness to sex.
In this case, I would say TAC is not indicated for focusing on a sexual response.
This is congruent with what I’ve found from TAC. TAC definitely has a dampening, buffering effect on anone, which prevents the anone from hitting hard and instantly, but in turn creates that ‘simmering’ quality you referred to. In a mix which is already sufficiently buffered, TAC is counter productive. But when TAC is used as the primary anone buffer the slow, ever increasing desire and arousal is amazing. It has lead to sex for me, and I could see it leading to sex in many different circumstances (although I realise this situation is different, and the thread is about the best mix for the particular situation)
Would I be shoved in the HE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE’S TALKING ABOUT column, if I say that it sounds like TAC is best served as a buffer, OR! like TUTH, just before/when you know … the clothes starts to/are going to be shedding?
Lordy, if I may, what would 20 mcgs of P96 do to the SD-J1 mix; and with how many exposures? If your work turns out to be true … you’re way ahead of the crowd, ‘IF’ you’d ask me! How I appreciate your sharing!!!
I have been working on improving the algorithm I use to order the calculations. It seems that the best way to achieve the goal of the mix, which had escaped me until now, is to calculate for the pheromones that most affect her in the way primarily desired. For a sexual response, I’m guessing that would mean such pheromones as androsterone, androstenone, P83 and P96 would need to be calculated first.
This means I have to determine a way to calculate all possible combinations and permutations, which I don’t think I’ll be able to do without figuring out how to make the calculator into a software program which uses some sort of artificial intelligence. Try as I might, I have not yet been able to figure out how to turn it into software because it is so complex for input.
I’ll have to try calculating starting with androstenone and then using TAC as a primary buffer.
And the calculator will fascinate and baffle you for a long time to come, rest assured. lol
TAC’s best uses are not necessarily indicated by a series of experiments dealing with one specific woman. But, in her case, TAC dampens the urge to merge to such a degree (the way I calculated it) that it virtually negates the sex response.
Adding 20 mcg P96 instead of 10 gives an indicator of interest and attention, but seems to indicate a more emotional attraction than sexual overall, with sex being positively indicated at between 20 and 24 total exposures.
Non-sequitur. My calculations are for determining her sexual response specifically in regard to her having sex with me under these circumstances. They do not delve into whether she has an orgasm, or why, or if it is enhanced thereby.
I have said it many times before, I have an unexplainable, uncontrollable attraction to genuine natural redheads, but not all of them. It depends on more than just hair and skin color. Personality plays a big role too; for instance, a stunningly beautiful natural redheaded sex goddess might be crossed off my list because she is a control freak, primadonna, abusive, stupid, etc.
One of my female friends is ideal in regard to her red hair: perfect shade, type and length. But I would never date her because she’s controlling, and wants to be treated like a princess all the time. I wouldn’t put up with her BS for five seconds if we were trying to be more than friends, and red carpet nymphomaniac or not, I have zero desire to inseminate this woman.
Another example was a woman who was absolutely perfect except she was about as intelligent as your average parakeet. Looking back, I sometimes wonder if maybe that wouldn’t have been a bonus, and then I remember that no, it wouldn’t have. I need an intelligent woman.
As for carpet matching drapes, I have met natural redheads whose carpet does not… and I don’t refuse to date her because of that… but it’s a lot more fitting of my ideal if it does.
You have outed yourself! No true red-o-phile would ever say that! lol
All women have a vagina. Not all women have pale skin, freckles, and all that passion. There’s something strangely satisfying about standing there while a redhead breathes fire at you, and after she’s done and you’re glowing red hot from it, telling her she makes you hot. lol Or tackling her and wrestling for a while. Either or.
Further observation and experimentation appears to reveal that in some cases, a woman may be affected positively and resist completely without apparent reaction or ab-reaction, for as long as she can, before the result is a backlash effect, during which time she indulges herself completely and without any resistance at all.
I have not seen this indicated very often, but it is significant, and I theorize that this will be a case in which the stimulus may be too much sexual pressure to be ideal, but not to a significant degree.
Ha, ha yeah. You know for some strange reason I always thought Lindsay Lohan was kind of hot with her freckles and all, but her personality and shit she’s been through kills it so I hear you on the attraction for a certain red-o-phile being there but then being dampened by shit like that. Bleh.
