Amen to that.
Yes, correct it’s just a long story that would better be left alone.
Geezus, man!!! When is your book coming out, 'cause you’re interesting the hell out of me! You any kin to Tacitus!?
So with SD-J1 as it is, 10 mcgs of P96 … is the total exposures less or more?
Thanks for peaking my interest!
Yep. Forget it. I’ll just wait for one who’s not messed up.
I’ll take that as a high compliment. lol
I have a book coming out soon, but it has nothing to do with pheromones or my research in that direction. And no, I’m not kin to Tacitus. I just have too much curiosity and enough brains to make that a dangerous thing. lol
I’m not sure I understand your question about SD-J1. The formula I gave was the optimal formula for seducing her, as calculated, if I was going to actually do that. I would much rather not mess with her family.
That compliment was higher than giraffe bootay! 
My question was to the number of exposures with the orginal SD-J1, but I just reread it, and it’s 4-5 exposures. Sowwy to cause the confusion, o-wise-one.
Just discovered another way to seduce her. 140 mcg P96 is calculated to work better than anything else. SD-J1 is calculated to produce sex if I wear it around her once, but never again will that happen. 140 mcg P96 shows FIVE WEEKS of continual sexual activity (once per week or more) if I wear it around her whenever she is around me. God I wish I could test this out, cause I’m really having a hard time accepting these results as being accurate.
This is really fascinating… I’m going to have to branch this out and figure out what doses of P96 do what to other women.
So, all of the above is for the ONE woman that you do NOT want, or a blue print to test for all others, Lordy?
I’ll give that 140 mcgs a test run around a few people … when … P96 is back IN STOCK.
Everything in this thread deals with research and experiments I am doing specifically concerning this one woman. And if she was single, I’d land her in my life so fast she’d have a broken back from landing so hard. But, I’m not a homewrecker. So I’m gathering what information I can from this. Remember, she’s married, has a kid, and is 16 years younger than me. That makes for an interesting test bed, no pun intended.
Therefore, what you see here cannot be taken to work for everyone else. Indeed, my calculations show that very little of it would have the same effect on most women I meet.It’s an interplay between her personality, her situation and my personality.
I would not have this situation with every woman who was her age and had a kid and was married. Personalities differ. Body chemistries differ. But, these experiments I am doing concerning this female, and several others I have calculated out, seem to be revealing that as long as we have personalities that do not completely clash, and I spend enough time around them wearing the right mones, eventually I can get the woman to initiate sex regardless of her status as a married woman or whatever other level of “takenness” she claims.
This isn’t just pheromones. This is my personality too. I can be damned difficult to resist when I want something, let me tell you. But in a case of a taken woman, where I am not actively trying to seduce her, where without the mones she would do nothing unless I initiated, could I get a married woman I get along with personality wise to sleep with me? That’s what I’m trying to understand: what difference do the mones themselves make? And done right, it’s all the difference in the world, given these factors:
- Her personality.
- The mones used.
- The number of, and time of exposures.
- My personality and how it interacts with hers.
- Do I want to sleep with her?
Remember, Miss J here is by all accounts a faithful wife and loving mother. She may not be thrilled with the particular man she’s married to, but they have a good working marriage relationship and a kid together, and they’re making it work comfortably.
Indications show that without mones, I would have to literally play hardball with her to get to sex, and it would invariably result in either her leaving him for me, or her feeling like I seduced (maybe even raped!) her into destroying her marriage, with all that that entails. It wouldn’t be pretty regardless.
But with mones - even being passive, and rejecting her advances unless she initiates directly and aggressively - I can still trigger sex with her, at least once. And I’m not just talking Monica Lewinsky style lovin’s. I’m talking full on-the-floor animal style hard charging ouch-it-hurts-afterword-and-not-just-my-knees, lose-it-completely f*cking.
Fortunately, the probability of stumbling on the exact mones and doses for triggering this sort of response is damned unlikely. That saves the human race from a lot of trouble.
And that, by the way, is why my calculator is not for public use. lol
I am promoting catlord from the senior lecturer position to a head of department. then we shall awaits the thesis for the proffesorship.
Obviously I understand the reasoning even if I do find it slightly frustrating. What’s exciting for me is not the sex part at all. If Catlord has an algorithim for determining which pheromones are needed for what period of time to determine the results then he also has 2 other items. One he has a calculator that allows him to understand the basic motivational programming for each individual. And 2 he must have a precise database of information for each putative and their expected results. What I want is the database.
Great theory btw. Would love to know what my wife’s program is. I have narrowed down a few items that I know will get me sex in certain times of her cycle ( I keep notes 
), but it would be awesome to know what to wear on the other days to keep intimacy going even when we are not having sex and be able to trigger a sexual response when we have time.
A promotion! How nice. 
I’m going to demand a 50% pay raise, too, cause my home lab is getting expensive, lol
Unfortunately, that database is not something I can share either. Even if I wanted to - and believe me, if I could, I would already have done so. Long since. Contributions to science and all that. But it is not something that is possible for me to do, because I cannot directly access it myself. I must actually infer these things from my results. The database is accessed by the calculator remotely. Unfortunately… cause I’d give my left testicle to see it directly myself. It would make this a LOT easier for me in my research.
Update on Miss J:
No contact whatsoever for the last couple months. The only thing I can think of was that she or her husband decided that I was too interesting to her, given her married status, and she/they decided to end all contact. Experiment a success? I don’t know fully. But nothing ever happened so it’s no big deal. She will not return phone calls, IMs or e-mails. Since she was a friend of the family by the end, I can only presume hubby got upset and put his foot down… although she’s not the type to take kindly to that, and he’s not really the aggressive masculine take charge kind of guy. So we’ll chalk this up to “???”.
Experiment over.
Well thank you sir. You have still managed to shed more light on the situation and even better the possibilities.
Have you considered creating generic profiles then? For instance a BestBuy has profiles for their customers that their employees learn in order to complete sales. These profiles aren’t perfect, however in a given situation the employee can determine if the customer type is A,B, or C and then sell to that customer in a way that they feel comfortable with.
Thank you Catlord.
Generic profiles are already available here on the forum. Age, race, gender, blood type. My efforts would be useless to be better, given that the majority of what I see from the calculator is telling me that the variables change every day and ou have to basically track them constantly to maintain optimal results. Every day I wear pheros, I calculate out which ones and what dose will be optimal. Some patterns emerge based on my physiology and personality, but they won’t be universally useful for anyone else in most cases. Consider my consistent observation that 4 sprays of IJ makes Latinas try to practically rape me, while most other guys can’t handle even three sprays of the stuff.
Basically we are dealing with a very complex set of variables, many of which are constantly changing, and you must be able to map them all simultaneously to calculate the optimal result.