Surprisingly I have had only two takers. I think what some fear is that they will be ‘trapped’ into a confession against pheromones. As one poster pointed out, I could send no real pheromones and when someone said “I felt this effect” then I would reply “ha-ha! There were no pheromones!”. the question begs; if there are no pheromones, why the effect?
This test (both no-mone), of course, would actually show there was NO NEED for pheromones. Not that they didn’t work. Because, if the placebo were so strong that a large percentage would report effects, then it would be logical to argue that placebo is enough. Why need pheromone if the same ‘subtle’ differences can be achieved without?
Anyway, I only have 2 people so far. ![]()