Has anyone used high amounts of TAF with -none? I am thinking 1:1 or even 1.5:1 in favor of TAF. What were the observations?
Reading about TAF a lot in past threads. One thing for sure if TAF does what it has done for other users and what Harris has explained about it so far, it should really make the reactions to -none very noticeable. Comments? (I don’t own TAF, although I do have -none in various forms)
I have recently begun looking into molecule F also, and what Harris tells me about the F/None interaction sounds intriguing. I need to get F and TUTH.
doesnt do anything special. esp since none sticks around a lot longer than taf which diffuses very quickly.
might want to try a314 w/ taf (a314 oil holds taf down a little longer). i noticed some interesting hits, but im not to keen on how it feels. (very serious combo)
Perhaps not by itself does it do anything special, but I was planning to mix them into Seduction. 
…lol
i am confused as to what TAF and TAK do. i understand TAF increases focus, so i am also intrigued as to how this mixes with 'none.
TAK…? and TAA is a feelgood 'mone, but alone from Ishine, does it have drawbacks? what about TAA and 'none?
'none certainly changes the dynamics of everything.
The grand problem is achieving uniform diffusion
I’ve worked on this by using a thick leather substrate that the mones in question were diffused into for 48 hours before wearing, and waxy binders like monolaurin have been successful too… the “industry” has a few possible equalizing solutions that may or may not find their way into moneland. Fine spun wool layers might be excellent, there are now merino shirts that are as fine as cotton, a touch scratchy so a superlight layer under them would be nice… although wool excels at holding and releasing a wide range of molecular structures… absolutely ingenious engineering from a fiber design standpoint… there are a host of polymer binders, encapsulants, varied sticky glops that try to hold everything down 
… they so far seem rather mediocre, better than no fixation… monolaurin works as well for me as anything and it has the advantage of being antibacterial, odorless, and good for the skin… -none in general isn’t my favorite thing to use in a general setting 
… P79 plus P83 carefully applied might get you more of what you want and less of what you don’t want.. which is the “out of the blue” androstenone jackass syndrome… or the “let’s get it on baby no I changed my mind you have to leave now” 
schizo move… If I were a devoted -none user, I’d sure think more about the kindly, softer, empathetic balance of a P74, estratetraenol (a real goodie), maybe a touch or two of the humorous TAC which can have a Santa Claus joviality about it… and that odd ball P86 that has, or so far seems to have, kind of a childlike wonder inducing quality… 
Already I have run out of space on my shelves for my mones, and yet I keep discovering more and more that I want to try… darn you, Harris! lol
So tacitus, what is “out of the blue androstenone jackass syndrome”, and what’s this schizo move thing? And, you’re saying you think p79 and p83 together would be a good potential none challenger?
Tacitus, what form of monolaurin do you use? Where do you get it and how do you mix it with mones?
I have long been looking for a gel base to mix my spray based mones with to make it easy to spread out and make it last longer. Could this be a possible solution?
I have read many times on l-s that gel basedproducts have worked better for many people like SOE gel works better than the roll-on version. Someone mentioned what they call aura effect that you can achieve with the gel.
Yes very good point Tacitus-that is exactly what I am hoping for. The day where I wont need to risk wearing -None to ‘turn up the temperature’ hehe… Keep up the good work!
I don’t know about P83 (haven’t tried it yet and not enough user feedback) but P79 has potential for this application. 
Visionary