Diane, you are actually getting pretty close to my Sensuality Mix. Have you read that string?
I wonder what your experience would be if you replace your TAC with a similar (or slightly larger) amount of TAA (or Instant Shine). I recently tried replacing the TAA in my mix with TAC. You’ve already read and commented on that post. If you are willing to try that, I am extremely interested in a woman’s experience comparing TAA vs TAC for sex.
We both use a P83 an energizer, a TAF focuser and a MEO-EST enhancer. My Sensuality Mix relies more on P86 and P87 where yours is weighted more toward EST and MEO-EST. That may be a male/female thing. Men are supposed to be more visual and P86 definitely provides a “Shallow Hal” visual enhancement whereas EST is supposed to be a female pheromone. I have begun experimenting with adding EST to my formula, and it has a powerful impact. The same can be said for P103.
The other thing I’d like to suggest you experiment with – it should be no surprise – is P86 and P87. After a good deal of experimenting I have come to the conclusion that the correct ratio of P86 to P87 is 5:1. I believe that P86 is more visual and P87 is more empathic, and 5:1 provides the best balance between aestheic appreciation and feeling. I think there is a big risk of P87 overwhelming the P86, though Tater’s “second base” formula uses more P87 (35mcg P87, 10mcg P86, 2.5 mcg P83, 50mcg MEO-EST). You probably want to keep your heavy EST, MEO-EST emphasis, so I’d suggest trying something like 12.5mcg P86 with 2.5mcg P87, if this experiment catches your interest.
Anyway, please keep us informed about your experiences with your “hot sex combination”.
W