hmmm strange that i managed to somehow get unsubbed from my own bloody thread.
oh well. all good info and I will deffinitely start low. if for no other reason than to minimize possible negative effects to myself and or build up a tollerance.
I don’t know about you paradox,but I find that you don’t need alot of A1.i see great results with only 10mcg.my sweet spot is 20mcg and straight A1 is better than cohesion
I concurr with Leon: 10mcg is enough for me maybe 20 mcg if in an open enviroment.
Never had depression in myself or others just no discernable benefit in using larger doses.
Just had ladies purring and wanting to touch/hug me.
Also had the lasting Crush effect, girls contacting weeks later when they are “feeling lonely” and want to have a “chat”.
I believe that the depressive problems manifested themselves when people were using larger doses than needed.
I am currently prepping my own oil with Clary Sage which was the original cover scent/essential oil used in IFM.
Going for around 5 mcgs A1 per drop .
Shame some essential oils have nearly doubled in price since I last bought a load.
seems to me to be more and more added added to a mountain of empirical evidevce strongly suggesting what works for one one way may work for another another way.
all good data IMHO. it kills me ADR people cant/dont use A1 data.
Ahh who cares - A1 is as far as I know the only pheromone that has empirical scientific evidence backing some of it’s properties described here on the forum (UC Berkeley if I remember correctly).
Androtics is collecting data on all the other stuff
Empirical evidence (also empirical data, sense experience, empirical knowledge, or the a posteriori) is a source of knowledge acquired by means of observation or experimentation. Empirical evidence is information that justifies a belief in the truth or falsity of an empirical claim. In the empiricist view, one can only claim to have knowledge when one has a true belief based on empirical evidence. This stands in contrast to the rationalist view under which reason or reflection alone is considered to be evidence for the truth or falsity of some propositions. The senses are the primary source of empirical evidence. Although other sources of evidence, such as memory, and the testimony of others ultimately trace back to some sensory experience, they are considered to be secondary, or indirect.
In another sense, empirical evidence may be synonymous with the outcome of an experiment. In this sense, an empirical result is a unified confirmation. In this context, the term semi-empirical is used for qualifying theoretical methods which use in part basic axioms or postulated scientific laws and experimental results. Such methods are opposed to theoretical ab initio methods which are purely deductive and based on first principles.
wiki FTW
Thus we are all, when making observations about mone interactions be they with self or others reactions “hits”, compiling empirical evidence.
That’s the problem with just following what others are doing.
With such a personal thing like mones you need to experiment yourself.
Dont get tied up in Emperical scientific studies, Analysis paralysis.
just try it out and enjoy yourself.
Let us know how you do
This forum thrives on personal experience.
lol… My point exactly but, that’s the cool part. Even tho we are out having fun with it, it’s still usable emperical evidence. That reminds me I need to type up my notes on P102 so far.
(Point #1: Thanks all for tolerating my public notes to self. If I mark them as private notes to self, they never get done!)
(Point #2: If there are any itching questions you want to write me in PM, how about making a public post and privately messaging me to respond? Public posts can benefit thousands, and take the same amount of time for me to write. )
(Point #3: Unless of course it is private. Then you know what to do.)
