Here is my new experiment to weed out false positive hits.
My idea 5 guys all will grab a bottle and spray it on them containing pheromones. Catch only i know that only 1 bottle actually had phero’s in it and the smell of the phero will be concealed with cologne.
I will record and document there hits each night and get an average. Ill randomly have a diffrent guy with phero’s each night. some times the same guy. They will believe they have phero’s on them
now i will record each hits from each guy and see how the average comes off.
Im going to figure it out but it will involve mixs of
A314
instant honesty
instant openness
Instant shine
turn up the heat
i work with these now to figure out how to do this without my lab rats caugh i mean friends from finding out that i didnt give them phero’s will be fun.
Ya i got plenty of time i go out at least 4x a week with the same group of friends and they do as i say not as i do. Im mr. alpha ;p
I’m not sure if I understood this correctly, please correct if I am, but I believe you make a good point. The combos that work well for you or one of your friends might not be the best combo for another friend that is being tested. The question that your test brings up is:
If each person had an “optimal” (I say “optimal” because there is never one solid “perfect” mix) tailored for their persona, physical appearance, needs and desires, how would the experiment pan out? Would you all be competing equally amongst each other? Or would the different mixes attract different girls?
This is definitly a great idea to really see what is placebo and what is genuine
Btw, I think that Androtics might be already doing this, someone mentioned (i believe its jasmin) that one or two putative products contains no pheromone or putative pheromone at all
EDIT: It was michael, pretty sure, but can’t pinpoint on the exact post. And I think he meant to explain to whole idea of putative, so no one should worry about this
A basic single blind test. To truly test, a double blind is generally used so that they observer is not biased since he does not know who has the real product. One problem with your test is smell. Your combination of real product is going to have a scent, you will need to have a match to that scent or they will know the guy that smells is the one wearing them. You would have to use a cover that is strong enough to hide it and that will skew your results since it could be that the hit was on the scent and not the product.
All in all worth trying but it will be a lot of work to make it viable.
Ponderu
Really? Do you have a link to that post please? Somehow I cannot imagine this to be true, because personally I would be a little pissed when I’d give Androtics my hard earned money for something that is intended to not work at all…
Michael has mentioned this before, Putatives are molecules suspected to act like pheromones. Some end up working out some dont.
So yes there are some that may not do squat and they do have a general idea what molecules do what when they release them they are just looking for us to report consistantly with what they already know about each molecule.
I think he is referring to only the putatives, Its not that they KNOW they dont work. Its blind testing, In most blind testing one will be a placebo. This indicates how much is imagined and how much is real reactions. So if you buy say P79 you will get the same P79 as every other person. But as new putatives come out there may be one or two P numbers that just dont act as pheromones but they release them for testing to see the placebo effect which is important to there research findings as well. I am not saying this is there testing procedure but it is normal scientific practice.
I think this is why Michael stresses “Suspected” when he releases a molecule for testing.
I do recall the post he is referring to but I cant find it either. I will keep searching.
