Yes. That and MX172 are most similar. A314 Classic is up to “Revision 12”.
Well, that’s our old versioning system, anyway. I suppose we should change it to v1.2 or v2.2. I’d prefer v1.2. Even though it’s gone through 12 changes, they’ve been very minor in terms of end results generated. The “heart” has stayed the same.
So, you had an even older bottle of A314, didn’t you? Rev 11? Do you notice any difference between that and this one?
That’s right… you can chalk it up mostly to superior diffusion in the spray version (and perhaps the different diffusion curve, which may be releasing pheromones you’re particular fond of faster, and ones you aren’t, more slowly).
There may be a few more mods made to an eventual spray version of A314. I should take MX172 and make variations of it for the next A314 test pack.
See what a lower -none version will do, a TACless version, one with P80, etc. I’d love to be able to predict what all possible variations would do, but sometimes there’s surprises in a complex mix. Predictions are inferior to actual test results at this point in the game.
Interesting.
Yes, I definitely know what an anchor is.
I suppose that’s good for the consumer products (nothing wrong with making people feel good usually), but not so good for the testing realm. Great observation. I’ll note this bias when considering test results.