p95 exposed

Field Reports & Anecdotal Experience Men's Pheromone Advice & Field Reports
1

Recently I had been looking for a “comfort pheromone”, a pheromone to provide a sense of connection and bonding similar to P96 at the bar or club especially when I wear high -none pheromones like Ammo and TUTH. I believe p95 affords me the same comfort which allows me to wear high -none mixes. However, I think it is better than p96 in that respect at a club. It is more of a playful connection/bonding, compared to p96 which to me feels more like a familiarity connection/bonding. So you can easily kino, kiss and make out at clubs with p95 on. p96 though, is superior in one-on-one scenarios, like on a date. I have tried this for a few days now with good results and I thought I would share. Watch p95 also go out of stock soon :slight_smile:. Hopefully it does not run out, as it is part of the Golden 13 molecules.
Also you only need about 2.5mcg for the playful connection and bonding (more than that and you ruin this effect, you give off a beta vibe) compared to 10-20mcg of p96, so it is also cost effective than using p96 which you would be lucky to get your hands on.

PS. I need to update my club mix rankings when I first started PheromoneTalk here, since I am single again:

Consumer Line: AMMO, A314, Instant Shine, Instant Openness, Instant Honesty, Turn Up the heat, Instant Gentleman, Instant Jerk, Come Talk To Me Mix 2, A1

MX Series: MX297, MX301, MX330, MX412, Project UF, Project UF2, Project UF2.5

Putatives: P75, P78, P83, P86, P91, P93, P95, P96, P102, P114, P130

Experimones: P74, P79, TAC, TAA, TAF

2

Compare if you will P95 to Alpha Androsterone, Beta (Epi) Androsterone, A314 and IG. You are not the first to have compared P96 and 95.

3

No comparison but to me P95 is a softener like TAH without the feminine vibe and it can be beta and asexual in higher doses. Do believe P95 is the steering molecule in IG which makes the high Androsterone possible.

4

Still18, you are my hero :slight_smile:. You have it exactly right.

Consumer Line: AMMO, A314, Instant Shine, Instant Openness, Instant Honesty, Turn Up the heat, Instant Gentleman, Instant Jerk, Come Talk To Me Mix 2, A1

MX Series: MX297, MX301, MX330, MX412, Project UF, Project UF2, Project UF2.5

Putatives: P75, P78, P83, P86, P91, P93, P95, P96, P102, P114, P130

Experimones: P74, P79, TAC, TAA, TAF

5

You both are essentially of one mind. I tested plain e Rone and e None before TUTH and A314. I find more than 5 mcg e Rone one of the least desirable molecules to wear alone: the antithesis of James Bond. Bond’s elderly uncle, more like. Buffering the heavy Rone in 314, for example, would require small amounts of very potent buffers. I don’t feel 5 m c g TAL, TAH or TAK could do so. I find evidence from female reports that 2.5 m c g Alpha Androsterone is well liked, sometimes much more than e None (thus AMMO). I can find 5 mcg of nothing (or any reports thereof) that buffers 15 mcg Alpha Rone toward the 314 effect. A. Rone at even 5 micros feels barely like 314 to me. I am not treated respectfully with raw A. Rone. I find an 80% / 20% B. Rone / A/ Rone plausible. I search for any experiment that buffers 15 mcg A. Rone successfully. I find zero. I can proffer no proof as to 95 or IG. I do find TAK amplifies the awe of 314. 4 drops + 15 mcg turns a party into a funeral in 30 mins. I haven’t tested 95, but in the New Year, I will.

Androtics sold raw epirone years ago. It likely still does, perhaps as a putative. 95 seems a compelling candidate. I think a small amount of A. Rone makes a larger amount of B. Rone possible. BTW, I don’t recall anybody ever said 314 or IG was mostly A Rone. It was just assumed.

6

You don’t get it, everything you read on the board, findings, results - it is all based on gossip and opinion, so don’t believe what you read and find out for yourself. This thread is about P95, without the first hand experience of P95 I don’t see why your comments matter.

7

Monesmadedoit,
I see you thanked me for my initial post but I don’t understand your subsequent comments. I never said I was the first to compare p95 to p96. I was just sharing what I found using p95 at the clubs and for you to disagree with what I observed, without ever having tried p95 is to put it mildly absurd. Sorry.
We spend upwards of 100’s and 1000’s of dollars on pheremones just to get the right combination/mix to help us with the opposite sex. Trust me, I have tried several combinations of mixes that others professed to be good for them and found them to be duds and lost ‘good’ girls in the process. So may be you should try it before disagreeing and I am not trying to be confrontational just trying to help the community. Good luck when you try p95 in the new year. Happy Holidays!

Consumer Line: AMMO, A314, Instant Shine, Instant Openness, Instant Honesty, Turn Up the heat, Instant Gentleman, Instant Jerk, Come Talk To Me Mix 2, A1

MX Series: MX297, MX301, MX330, MX412, Project UF, Project UF2, Project UF2.5

Putatives: P75, P78, P83, P86, P91, P93, P95, P96, P102, P114, P130

Experimones: P74, P79, TAC, TAA, TAF

8

I agree 100% and I’ve learned so much about P95 from your journal reports these past few years. I can’t wait to test P95 after the holidays. Thanks for tipping me off to a great find. :smiley:

9

You’re welcome and happy holidays buddy.

10

Thank you for encouraging me to think for myself. Not that I need much persuasion.

I see very little similarity to P96. Little to IG. Perhaps a tad. I find myself close to Wildflower’s observations. Bit of a cold molecule. If you’re looking for P74 or P96, I don’t see it. The cold, non-social and somewhat asexual tone could be why it is not quite the barnburner like P83? Ya think?

Still a valuable mone.

I could change my mind in a year.