Test batch 2 of VL1 (@1.0 ml of VL1 with @.5 ml of scented oil and @3.5 ml of cologne) is almost depleted. I loved the results but did not like working with an unknown quantity. I have no idea of how many mcg’s I was using. There is no way to tell how concentrated the molecule was.
This weekend I am going to pick up 2000 MG’s of VL1. This is a purer form of VL1. I had help with the math so I can make a 5ml with 5 mcg’s per spray.
This whole test sequence is sort of a loss until I find the correct dosage. Was I in the hundreds of mcg’s range or somewhere in the double digits? It’s not a total loss as I am being slowly convinced that VL1 definitely has pheromonal properties.
I’m really liking this molecule. Not because it’s my discovery but because it’s one of the few molecules that I like to wear solo. When paired with ENONE it’s a real one-two punch.
I’ll probably mix a batch on Sunday and start testing again on Monday.
Yesterday I wore the last of 3 sprays of test batch 2 of VL1 (@1.0 ml of VL1 with @.5 ml of scented oil and @3.5 ml of cologne).
Three sprays was the perfect dosage. I mixed it with 2 drops of NPA because I got such interesting reactions the first time I tried this.
On my way home on the bus a girl who was sitting next to me for about 15 mins got up to offer a seat to an older woman. The older woman declined several times saying she’d rather stand. The girl did not come back and sit down next to me. I thought that was a little strange.
When a bunch of people got off she sat across from me with her legs open . She had on sweat pants. She closed her legs, put on lip gloss, took out a hairbrush and started brushing her hair. The last stop was coming up so I assume she was getting ready for wherever she was going. One could probably attribute her open leg number to an unconscious momentary lapse as she was wearing sweats. But still…what if…
I am slightly upset because I have to do a whole new series of dosage testing. This is slightly offset by the fact that I have found a purer source for the molecule and I now have DPG, ENONE and TAA.
I mixed 3368 MCG’s of molecule VL1 in 2.5 MCG’s of DPG. Rough calculation is 67 MCG’s per spray. I applied 2 sprays this morning.
I may wash off and apply 4 sprays this afternoon. I am so eager to get this up and running again.
I took yesterday off to concentrate on the dosage. I ended up deciding to use the dosage from the 2nd batch. So the third batch will be @1.0 ml of VL1 with @4.0 ml of DPG.
The current supply of VL1 is purer than the last batch but I believe that this is a good starting point.
Today I am wearing 3 sprays of VL1 solo.
Once I get the correct dosage I’ll be able to mix this up and get the same results everytime.
BANG! I almost hit it on the head. The third batch which is @1.0 ml of VL1 with @4.0 ml of DPG is good! I know exactly how many MCG’s I used and can duplicate this bottle anytime. Hooray!
I wore 3 sprays yesterday and wow. It just seemed that women were more cooperative and “Lovey Dovey”. It seems like they were trying to be more in tune with me.
The purer VL1 with the DPG works much better than the 2nd batch which was VL1 + cologne.
I am so stunned. This molecule is far from over the top sexual ENONE. It is so much like A1 with none of the stink or ill effects of A1. VL1 lasts about 6 hours (3 sprays). It goes good with ENONE.
Maybe next week I’ll try VL1 with TAA and VL1 with P74.
As far as clubbing with VL1 I don’t know how it will react. Like I said before it’s not a heavy hitter but maybe it is the ultimate club molecule. Perhaps when heated by body heat it works even better. Maybe when mixed with ENONE it becomes killer in the club.
I have set batch 3 aside. I am now working with batch 4 which is @1.0 ml of VL1 with @1.5 ml of DPG & 2.5 ml of cologne.
Today I have 3 sprays on.
The reason I set batch 3 aside was because I did not see the performance that I had with batch 1 and 2. I’m hoping that the cologne makes the difference.
As usual my mind is racing and I’m thinking what if the results were from the second substance in VL1. The filler. What if it was the filler and the main ingredient.
The best course of action is to continue to test VL1. If I don’t get the same results that I did with the first two batches then go back to the original source and test again. The purer source may be the problem.
I can also prepare a batch with the 'filler" to find out if the filler is causing the pheromonal reactions. The filler actually could have pheromonal properties. that’s why I’m not ruling it out as a participant. It very well could be the lead driver.
The tests with batch 1 and 2 yielded consistant results while batch 3 doesn’t seem to be up to snuff.
I have to be careful when testing to eliminate wishful thinking and focus on what is actually happening. I want VL1 to do well but I have to be careful to observe actual unusual behaviors and not what I hope is happening.
Nothing from yesterdays test of 3 sprays of batch 4 .
So this is why research notes are kept, so you can see where you went wrong.
Batch 3 did not work like batch 1 & 2. I have 3 options:
Option 1: Go back to the batch 2 formula that had the original VL1 molecule.
Option 2: Continue to test batch 3 & 4 at higher and higher dosages as the dosage level may be the problem.
Option 3: Mix a test batch with the filler to see if it is the driving molecule.
I think I’m just rushing things a bit but I am freaking out a little. I feel like everyday at the wrong dosage or with no molecule performance is a lost day. I’ll be so glad once I figure out what happened.
Batch 1 & 2 worked fine. Batch 3 & 4 might be working also but 3 & 4 is not working at 3 sprays.
On Saturday I mixed a batch with the filler only but it looks like it will take awhile to dissolve. While that is dissolving I will mix a batch with 2.5 ml of VL1 and 2.5 ml of dpg.
If neither of these works the I can go back to the original source for VL1 or try and mix VL1 and the filler with dpg.
So yesterday I purchased some VL1 from the original source. Now I see why A314 rev 30 went awry. I was trying to make VL1 better but by straying from the original source I missed out on something that was making the molecule work.
I dont know wether it is the filler, the concentration, or the source that contributes to the molecules success but I feel compelled to solve this little mystery. I need to know because if it is the filler that is actually the driving component then I don’t need to spend money on the molecule, I can just buy the filler.
If it is the concentration then I can just increase the concentration.
If it is the source then that would kinda suck because that would mean that I have to purchase from them until I find a comparable source.
The last but least likely senario is that I am imagining things and that this molecule does not work at all. Not likely but it must be considered.
I made 2 new batches batch 5 which is @1.0 ml of VL1 (original supplier) with @4.0 ml of DPG and batch 6 which is @2.5 ml of filler with @2.5 ml of DPG.
Yesterday I wore 3 sprays of batch 5 and everything seems to have returned to the batch 1 & 2 state. I mentioned I was going to go shopping at Xyz store and one woman left the office and went to her car to get coupons for me to use. I really like VL1. Whew! I’m glad theis batch is good.
I will continue to test it as I am not positive yet that this is working like batch 1 & 2. VL1 is a soft hit but to me it is better than most of the stuff out there now. It’s only a single molecule but such a powerhouse. It hits softer than ENONE. It hits on the level of A1 and has none of the side effects.
Today I started off the day with batch 6. Nothing happened so I washed it off and applied 3 sprays of batch 5. No one is here today because it’s Good Friday however, a woman here asked me out to lunch in a roundabout way. Lol. She is always affected by VL1.
VL1 is consistant at 1.0 ml in 4.0 of DPG or cologne it acts consistantly the same. If I had any critism it would be that it doesn’t hit hard like enone.
I need one more day of testing (Monday) to make sure that this batch is working like batch 1 & 2 (I like to be thorough).
Pending the results on Monday I will start testing batch 5 with P74.
I mixed batch 7 today the same as batches 1,2, and 5 (@1.0 ml of VL1 original supplier with @4.0 ml of DPG).
I have about 2.0 ml of batch 5 left. Today I am wearing 3 sprays of batch 5 with 25mcg’s of P96.
So far it doesent look like anything special is happening. VL1 seems to be doing it’s thing but P96 is not contributing anything special.
I was going to test VL1 with P74 today. Last night I did some research on P74 and the writings of Tacitus are my “go to” for good quality information.
Of course I come across this classic Tacitus entry:
So I listened to Grant Green’s Idle Moments. LOL gotta love Tacitus. RIP my friend.
In other entries Tacitus lists P74 as a putative with Estrogenic qualities. I am not in a rush to try a femenine putative so I am trying it with P96 today.
There are only a few more sprays of batch 5 left. I’m loving this molecule. I love it as a solo daily wear.
I really want to make a 30ml of this. I’m thinking 5ml of VL1 in 25 ml of DPG.
This stuff is so good solo but my critism of it is that it’s not a hard hitter like enone. It pops really good with enone or NPA but doesn’t do much with TUTH.
I’ve also tried it with LIIK, Bad Wolf TAA and P96. with these the results are negligible.
Today I am wearing 3 sprays of VL1 with 10 mcg’s of P74.
Yesterday’s test of 3 sprays of VL1 with 10 mcg’s of P74 was interesting.
Men were more friendly and women were not as friendly. Men seemed to linger more whereas with VL1 solo women would linger more.
While it was ok with guys being buddy-buddy, I dont want to be percieved as a female. Tacitus always called it as he saw it. So maybe he is right again and P74 is estrogenic.
Friendly men means either the P74 is feminine or it just makes guys friendly.
Today I am wearing the last 3 sprays of VL1 batch 5 with 2 sprays of IG. So far my findings are similar to yesterdays.
P74 is one of the components of IG? It sure seems like it could be. I’m getting almost the same reaction from guys as I was with VL1 and P74.
I’ve started batch 7 today it was mixed the same as batches 1,2, and 5 (@1.0 ml of VL1 original supplier with @4.0 ml of DPG).
I found some P75 that I had and am trying 3 sprays of VL1 & 25 mcg’s of P75 today.
I learned something new about VL1…asian men don’t like it. I guess that this helps prove that VL1 has pheromonal properties. I have 3 examples in mind but in each encounter the Asian man seemed to be agrumentative.
I believe that certain pheromones affect certian races differently. I am not a scientist but in my testing with P83 I have found that it affects Africian American women differently (see my P83 notes in this journal). I have also noted that P93 affects caucasian women but the effects on other races is nominal.
I was trying out why everyone is so ga ga about P96.
I found nothing special about P96 (see my P96 notes in this journal).
Yesterday I tried 25 mcg’s of P96 with Bad Wolf. And here you go…
Apparently, P96 is a RONE modulator. It seems to sharpen the seriousness of the RONE.
Bad Wolf is a little less serious than (pre revision 30) A314. With P96 added I was getting very heavy status hits. It reminded me of revision 29 A314.
I am not the greatest of all pheromone testers but I consider myself to be one of the best. Unlike other tests, testing pheromones involves personal observations. These observations are very subjective. I see a woman twirl her hair and I observe nothing unusual. Someone else could see the same thing and claim they “got a hit”.
A woman could just look at someone testing/wearing pheromones and they would say they got a hit. Women look, twirl their hair, preen and show IOI’s all the time. They do these things matter of factly (is that a word?). Most of the time they don’t even know that they are doing it. Women preen for attention…consciously and subconsciously.
I reported on MX297 about 3 years ago. In those 3 years I have never heard of anyone getting laid while wearing MX297.
Don’t get me wrong it’s a good mix and it has its uses. I do however believe MX297 contains estrogens. EST or Meo-Est or both. Women do react to MX297 because girls love to meet new girlfriends.
It has been called. Instant BFF, Instant Friend Zone, Instant Girlfriend, Instant Ross (from Friends) and other such names.
I have found in my research that there is no way to make this feminine product masculine. Perhaps a drop with 15-25 mcg’s of ENONE would be ok.
I have been wearing pheromones since Andron by Jovan. So go figure out who is right and who is wrong. Is the world round or flat? LOL
VL1
What I can claim is VL1. I wear it everyday now. I discovered it and am loving it better than any other single molecule that I have ever worn.
I always enjoy your posts, Paradox as being the ‘best’ mone tester is as subjective as the testing itself. SO much of these observations require a comfortability (Is THAT a word?!) of yourself as well as a confidence in what you see as normal behaviour and what is an influenced behaviour due to mones/attittude/actions on your part.
You’ve got some great experience in that utility belt and are not afraid to use it. I do enjoy being around people with cajones!
Alpha1, I didn’t say I was the best. I did however say I was one of the best. That’s not conjecture it’s a fact.
There are some good mixes out there and some Genius mixes. I consider pre rev 30 A314 to be a Genius mix.
I could blow my own horn here (again)…but I won’t. I will say this though. Three years ago when others were jumping up and down praising the effects of MX297, I was the first one to figure out that it was not the sexual attractant that everyone thought it was. I surmised that the attraction was Estrogenic and not sexually driven.
I did not come from the nerd/geek world. I came here as a PUA. I have full PUA credentials. I know how to run and control sets, how to decipher womaneese and read body language.
I’d used Andron by Jovan, Yes by CoCohi, Lure by TLC and Realm by Erox for years before coming here.
I have studied on this and other forums for about 4 years. I still have much to learn but I am way ahead of the pack.
P, did you mean to say that PRE rev 30 A314 is a genius mix? I am finding that rev32 is a good general attractant but yields no respect/intimidation hits even at higher doses.
BTW, do you find P74 to be estrogenic? I strongly suspect it is.
. She had on sweat pants. She closed her legs, put on lip gloss, took out a hairbrush and started brushing her hair. The last stop was coming up so I assume she was getting ready for wherever she was going. One could probably attribute her open leg number to an unconscious momentary lapse as she was wearing sweats. But still…what if…
