I wonder how much of pheromonal effect is based upon pheromone dependent biochemical response vs placebo effect that establishes a positive feedback loop resulting in congruent behavioral change. Simply put, does a “happy” or “horny” pheromone biochemically make you have that response or is some of the effect due to the fact that you know you are taking it and thus some of the effect is psychological - i.e. you know you are taking instant shine or turn up the heat so you begin acting more social or sexy and people respond accordingly?
How much of the pheromone is effecting you biochemically vs external “targets”. I am new here but I have seen a good bit of discussion on acting congruent with the pheromone mix you are using. I wonder how much of the effect is conditioned pavlovian behavioral response of the user, which in turn effects the response they get from those they interact with. I am not saying that its all “imagined” or just in our own minds - since pheromones clearly have been shown to incur biochemical changes in targets as well as the wearer. But since some wearers seem to respond more strongly than others, I wonder if their chemistry or their mindset that is the determining factor. I would think that self hypnotic techniques, used within NLP and ericsonian models would be very helpfull in amplifying biochemical effects (when I spray on Instant Gentleman, I become as suave, cool and in control as James Bond).
Obviously, measurement of “success” is a highly subjective experience and difficult to accurately measure. But perhaps some of the more experienced users can posit on how much congruent behavior and internal mental programming has effected your results when using different pheromones.