Your use of social proof is just great, Josef! I’ve seen people talk about very rarely, and the ones who talk about it… I doubt use it. Very interesting strategies you have. I hope people here learn from them.
I also really appreciate your testing strategy. I love it when people assume as little as possible.
That said, I’ll try to be as vague as possible, but still give some useful suggestions.
Try getting into a “deep” conversation with TAF, or going on a walk with someone, and seeing what kinds of details you notice.
Also notice how “clear” (nor not) your perceptions are.
I’m wondering, when you were looking for b12 with less fillers, how clear the details were to both of you… and if your sense of time shifted (time passing faster or slower than your normal sense of “clock time”).
So far, so weird with TAF. I have a good deal of data on it, and some interesting personal experiences.
One tester (who had no idea what pheromones were) did get what seems to be almost traditional “hits” with it when mixed into a normal cologne, but otherwise, most people report nothing like what you’d find from a typical pheromone. It makes me question what mother nature has up her sleeve. 
For all “practical” (meaning simple) purposes, I’ve found it best used alone for longer and sensory rich shared experiences (a long walk with a friend or lover)… or, in mixes, best used with an emotive driver. Something else to take the wheel and lead in terms of what is communicated (A314 for masculinity and leadership, -none for raw muscularity, -anol for giddiness, etc), with TAF modifying the experience of the event.
This isn’t what I’d recommend for most molecules, but: Maybe your next test could involve a pheromone you’re very familiar, used along WITH TAF. Then note the differences.