The anti-sex generation

this from SLATE:

"Generation Scold Why millennials are so judgmental about promiscuity.

In the late '60s and early '70s, when “sleeping with someone was almost like shaking hands,” womanizers had a certain allure, according to Norris Church Mailer in her charming new memoir A Ticket to the Circus. She knew her husband Norman was involved with several other women when she met him and even after she married him. But she stayed, because “the good outweighed the bad,” she writes. Also, “the sex was always great.”

http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/tr/14302-93014-3722-0?mpt=7849683876?

http://haku.vizu.com/a.gif?cid=621;adid=logo;siteid=slate;?7849683876

The Don Juans were always a source of trouble and danger for women, but they also carried a whiff of glamour. These days, they’ve lost even that. A cad is just a cad, and a cheated-on wife is a source of shame and embarrassment to women, great sex notwithstanding. “If she’s looking to avoid judgment, she told some of the wrong anecdotes,” writes Jezebel’s Sadie Stein of the Church Mailer memoir, “It read, to me, more like cautionary tale than love story.” When the fabulous feminist, free-love advocate, and former Norman Mailer sparring partner Germaine Greer wrote about sleeping with director Federico Fellini, the reaction was equally scolding.
It’s not just women who are being judged for their sexual choices. **DoubleX contributor Amanda Marcotte takes modern guys to task on the Daily Beast for using Facebook as a “G-rated version of … amateur porn.” The notion that men might be having sexual fantasies about women they know has an "undeniable ick factor" to it, Marcotte says. Even the ostensibly libertine Lady Gaga said recently, “It’s not really cool any more to have sex all the time. It’s cooler to be strong and independent,” as if one could not be simultaneously strong and sexually adventurous.

What’s changed? Why is there no category for a woman who chooses great sex over emotional comfort? Why did the lusty gentleman lose all his sex appeal? Apparently, the last few years have seen the rise of Generation Scold. The scarlet letter standard was once applied to married women who were unfaithful to their husbands. Now it applies to everyone—unmarried women, men, bystanders who let their men get away with it.
To merely suggest, say, that sex without a condom feels better will get you called idiotic, inflammatory, immature, not to mention self-loathing. You should know better, and if you behave without caution, Generation Scold has no sympathy for you.
The newest development is the judgment heaped on men for bad behavior. Women’s judgment of adultery and promiscuity in men has become far harsher, according to recent studies. The shift in attitude could be interpreted as a feminist advance. Women now hold men to the same stringent sexual standards that they themselves have long been held to. Even men are beginning to judge other men for promiscuity. What this points to is the end of a great American tradition: the double standard.
The prevailing cultural assumption has been that women are judged more harshly for overly sexual behavior than men are—women who sleep around are “sluts," while men who get around are "studs.” But this perception has been shifting for at least a decade among women. According to a 1999 study of Canadian female grad students published in the Journal of Sex Research, “Contrary to the double standard, the vast majority of women listed only negative words to describe either a man or woman who has had many partners.” They often labeled experienced men as “manipulative” and “exploitative,” and said they would warn their girlfriends not to date a man who had slept with 10 or more partners. This was years before Web sites like dontdatehimgirl.com made this kind of warning viral.
A new study confirms these findings. Sociologists Rachel Allison and Barbara Risman of the University of Illinois at Chicago surveyed over 17,000 college students through the Online College Social Life Survey and found that both men and women lost respect for members of the opposite sex who hooked up with a lot of people, according to a new report from the Council on Contemporary Families.li “In fact, slightly, but significantly more students [of both genders] say they would lose respect for a man who had hooked up and had sex with a lot than would lose respect for a similarly-engaged woman,” Allison and Risman observed. This wrinkle—that men are also now judging fellow men for promiscuity—is a new twist. [/li]One reason for the shift, they hypothesize, is the increasing power of young women to determine the sexual mores. They’re definitely rejecting the double standard against women. But rather than embrace a more relaxed standard for all, as the Church Mailer generation did, they are using this new “leverage to overwhelmingly disapprove of college men who hook up with a lot of partners.” And some men are echoing that disapproval. If things continue to change in this direction, say Allison and Risman, “this change will move society toward a more restrictive standard for all, rather than toward increasing freedom to sexual pleasure wherever one may find and desire it.”
This new data deepens the impression by authors Neil Howe and William Strauss in their book Millennials Rising, which pegged this generation as deeply conventional and traditional. They call the millennials a “corrective generation,” a group that reverses the “negative youth trends that boomers initiated.” To millennials, boomers “seem far too sexually obsessed and pleasure driven.” They found the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal deeply distasteful. Additionally, this generation was born into a post-AIDS world, where total sexual freedom was considered morally suspect and potentially deadly, something that Katie Roiphe lamented in her 1997 polemic* Last Night in Paradise.* Now that men have bought into the new rules about sex, the transformation seems complete.
“Think about the title: circuses are themselves kind of relics of another era, tinged as they are with fear, cruelty and terrifyingly unpredictable clowns,” Stein writes about the Church Mailer memoir. True, the death-defying trapeze of promiscuity has always seemed unpredictable and scary. But apparently, it’s no longer considered fun.

Hmm, I think this article fails to discriminate between two different sentiments; “That guy is promiscuous and thus bad” and “That guy is promiscuous and wrong for me as a romantic partner, but may be a good or bad guy for someone else or in a different connection”.
There is also a difference between promiscuity and sex. One can be very supportive of committed lust, but anti promiscuity for example. This is common among Jews and Moslems for example.

Personally, I’m a monogamous person and I would certainly require any romantic partner to be on the same page, so current promiscuity would be a dealbreaker for me. That said I have friends and acquaintances who are promiscuous or poly and I accept them for who they are. They are honest to all involved parties and above all honest to themselves, so I can love and respect them as friends even if they would not suit me for more.

I once had a friend who cheated on her husband and it definitely put some distance between us. I also had a guy friend who “fell in love” every three weeks or so and while he did not mean bad, he broke a lot of hearts so I have warned friends against him. He may have been honest about what he felt in the moment, but after twenty times you can see a pattern if you would look honestly at your own behaviour. I feel it is important to have friends who are reasonably honest with others, or I would not have ground to trust them.

The reason libertinism has lost its glamour is because the majority of people who sleep around and are dishonest to others, do so for reasons that are a bit tragic. What is glamorous about a girl who sleeps with men in hope to win love or about a boy who sleeps with women to prove himself a man? These are people to pity, not to envy. Maybe if you were locked in a bad marriage with bad sex like many were in the past, it can look glamorous because you do not get close enough to see the wounds of these people.

Also, if you think of sex as a bad thing, you will require a bad girl/boy to let yourself go sexually. You get the madonna/whore thing or maybe like a provider/pimp thing for women. Now that sex is a positive thing, a good man can give you at least as good sex as a bad one, so the bad man has nothing to offer but heartbreak and social disease.

Real liberation is not about having as many partners as you can, it is about having the choice to create the sex life that fits you, whether that is monogamous relationship, sleeping around, being comitted to more than one person, celibate, swinger or waiting for true love.

every social era has its’ unique norms, worldviews, and ethos. humans simply don’t live long enough to appreciate how completely the full force of the times shape the consciousness of the individuals living through them. If we could live for say, 500 years, we’d have been through so many movements, fads, wars, political cycles, we’d probably have something approaching objectivity… in reality we don’t have that luxury, being very neuroplastic when young, we’re indelibly stamped with the gestalt of our early years, it becomes the “wallpaper” of our mindset… some retain this quality of neoteny, the ability to adjust our central sense of self to the evolving conditions of life, some just don’t, the neurons harden or something, and they are the people of one historical moment…

You see the problem I see with this is that any trip to any regular north american college campus quickly eradicates any illusion that hooking-up has become uncommon.

Promiscuity has become the norm - It is mostly the feminists trying to push their agenda who are publishing “research” showing the opposite.