LOL. Thanks for the vote of confidence and the reps.
Most of us guys use 'none but we need to remember it is kind of a blunt instrument. So even when used well it is sort of like a blunt instrument used with finesse.
Read this post by Jasmin if you have not already. She has discussed this in several posts over the last couple years …
Be sure to read the whole passage to understand her philosophy. This is kinda the meat of the discussion for this purpose:
In other words, the folks who run Androtics (experts with this stuff) recognize the serious “downside” to 'none. To the point that a lot of the testing they have been doing and may still be doing with MXes and putatives was/is designed to create a “new” Ammo to give you some of the same results but without 'none and its “dark” side.
I would not be surprised to see that if Jasmin and company find a way to reliably create the attraction of 'none with none of its downside that we would see the use of 'none seriously curtailed or even those products that use 'none phased out but that is just me guessing … please do not run with that comment as any kind of wild rumor. This last paragraph is just me contemplating the pheromone future …