I think all of the more responsible individuals are a little -none wary.
Think about it. We’re very cautious with -none. We’ll use it, but label the product wisely so you know what you’re in for. (Turn Up the Heat, Instant Jerk, etc.)
James Kohl won’t touch the stuff, it seems. He’s a rone man. (Since he seems to like biking as a hobby, maybe he’s a natural -none guy like a lot of other bikers are?)
Dr. Dodd is a social phero guy.
Dr. Winifred Cutler seems be all about anything other than androstenone.
Erox and Pherin weren’t into -none. (but then again, that’s may be because they couldn’t patent it)
You’ll notice a lot of the sleezier /scammier companies are into -none. (when they include anything in their product at all, that is)
Then again, most of these companies don’t intend to stay open very long. They don’t really care about people much, they care more for the money in your wallet. Ultimately, they’ll take the money and run should they hurt anybody.
Whereas the rest of us have reputations to uphold, and we try to be good “citizens of earth”. We certaintly don’t want to mess anybody up.
I know, in our case, we’ve had long discussions about desiging consumer products to help dress up the “emotional atmosphere” of the world a bit. We’d hate to see a high -none product become truly popular, because of the way it could possibly raise the “emotional temperature” of the planet (making point shorter w/each other, more hot headed, etc.).
We’d rather give out a high androstenone / high special effect type product as a form of “proof” then steet people towards the more beneficiene stuff. Our planned consumer strategy so far is to give a small sample of “balls to the wall” PheroBomb with Ammo, but have the new Ammo be a good everyday, feel good product that spreads emotional benefits beyond the immediate vicinity of the wearer.
In this way, if we ever had a true commercial hit, we’d be creating something sort of like “positive pollution” instead of negative.
it’s a different way of thinking. I like it. I think if more businesses thought this way – if they thought of the “wins” involved for the world at large, beyond their own wins and wins for their end customer – then we’d have a much cleaner, happier planet.
Whatever we do, we want want to create any new problems in the world, or be part of an existing problem.
Anyway, I guess that’s why you see the sleezy or callous with their fake or -none products, and the more nurturing type people with products that are more social and beneficient to all.