Is it b-nol and a-nol???
oh and last–
IS = Beta-Nol???
IFM= none???
Come Talk To Me has both alpha and beta -nol in it. IFM behaves like a tweaked A1 mix, but I don’t know exactly what’s in it.
IS = is actually an abbreviation that should be “expanded” to avoid confusion (you know who you are, people who don’t “expand”).
As far as I know, Instant Shine (IShine) is mostly the experimental pheromone known as TAA and seems to be aimed primarily at men. “Contains 3 human pheromones…” (unidentified).
The other “IS” is Instant Sexiness for women (ISex) which claims to be a mix of 5 “human pheromones” (unidentified).
Also to the best of my knowledge, IFM is primarily an A1 (-anone) clone, NOT a -none product. -none is one of the LAST things you want to have around some women especially at “certain times” from what I understand (and have experienced to a degree). A1 is billed as a “relaxer” or a “mellower” whereas -none seems to be more of a “tension builder.”
Read over the store catalog description “details” and do a search of the forum posts to dig out some details.
Also note however that sometimes the “official” abbreviations can change in the catalog, as some recently did in the ExperiMone “miscellanious” section as things change, get added, subtracted, etc. Usually best to spell things out if in doubt. (The “official” abbreviations seem to have changed for the meo-est and Safari mix items I ordered a while back already for example. Not sure if it reflects a change in the ingredients/concentration/etc, or just something for the benefit of the order fulfillment folks/internal bookkeeping.)
I heard IO had both B-nol and A-nol.
Is this true???
now that ive done research. im thinking a good mix would be
CTTM ( b and a nol)–lots of chat, and deep convos
IS (confidence booster)
Ammunition (light none that could be managed easy)
this mix could be tweaked and managed really easy and at will for whatever circumstance.
hmmmm
IO is primarily A-nol, but has a small amount of B-nol to reduce the crazy non-stop chattiness prure A-nol can bring. There are also some other minor tweaks to it as well.
CTTM2 has more Anol than Bnol, but has a good deal more bnol than IO does. something like 60:40 or 70:30 for CTTM2
IH is Primarily Bnol, but with a small amount of anol to tweak it. Its a more serious vibe and brings about deep conversations and even deep secrets when worn. You can make a similar CTTM2 with both IO and IH.
I am thinking of getting either CTTM2 or probably IH for when I get into the early stages of a relationship IH will help you get a lot closer because of the revealing of hidden things about the other person and deep conversations.
IFM is a tweaked A1-like analogue. Everything a1 does, but with less negative side-effects on men. IFM can be great for increasing strong emotional connections if the woman already likes you.
or you could always buy B-Nol to adjust to your IO mixture. whenever you are out on a date, simply add more B-Nol to your mix.
why do some prefer A1 over none? Why couldnt you just use something like CTTM to soften the none? keep the edge but make etc more chatty.
hmmmmm
just wondering why IFM is more popular than lets say Ammunition, when Ammunition which has little none is stronger in sex appeal than A1 (I think) also probably smells better. esp for a none.
IS is not necessarily Instant Sexiness. Most people here use IS to refer to “Instant Shine”, and some women use it to refer to Instant Sexiness (even though there’ll be an Instant Shine for womem soon, too).
It’s a context sensitive jumble, and, unfortunately, we can’t have a hover definition for it, otherwise it’ll start defining the word “is” in all our sentences, too. 
Instant Sexiness, though, has 8 hormone derived pheromones, and 7 female scent components. Some would consider that 8 pheromones, others who consider aliphatic acids and the like inclusively would consider that 15.
Close!
Instant Openness has more than either alpha-nol or beta-nol, and will still make for non-stop chattiness once you get the ball rolling. The quantity is still there. The big difference between IO and pure alpha-nol is the quality of communication.
It’s a more communication oriented pheromone mixture than pure alpha-nol, which is more on the silly side of things.
I view pure alpha-nol as a fun special effect (that’s why I have high anol in fun products such as “Spaceland” and “Social Fabric Softener”), whereas IO is more useful in more contexts, such as at work or when meeting people. It’s a nice social catalyst.
CTTM M2 is very simple. It’s almost a completely even mix of ANOL to BNOL.
It’s mixes 3 through 8 of CTTM that go crazier on the ratios.
Correct.
Makes people quickly feel like they’ve known you a long time, and they drop their internal censors.
When you see the truth serum like effect for yourself, you’ll find it’s kind of eery that pheromones can do something this.
I find it perfect in any kind of sales situation (buying or selling)… you hear the darndest things that somehow always put things on your side.
Interpersonally (with friends or lovers), sometimes you hear what you don’t want to hear… which some of the forums users here can attest to.
It’s also great for making “fast friends”, and rapidly making deep bonds. It’s a rapport and closeness accelerator. I think it’s really great when you’re new to an area and want friends – you’ll certainly get 'em, because small talk will quickly turn to “It feels like I’ve known you forever” talk.
IH will do that for you more than CTTM M2.
It’ll definitely help to deepen the psychological intimacy of any relationship.
Hang out with her for a day wearing it, and it’ll feel like you’ve known her for weeks afterward. You’ll see what I mean.
With the number of “secrets” she’ll tell you, it’s also sort of like a “security” product. You’ll think “Good that I learned that about you now”.
I find it’s whether they like you or not. Gives you a halo women love, and men don’t care for.
It also pushes some women over the social edge to actually initiate with you for a change, which is interesting. It’s like it hits the “talk” button on some women all by itself. Not all, though. Women are still unpredictable, even with the best of pheromones.
That’s a good mix. You’ll smell great, too.
By lack of a ROFL smilie!
So should we abbreviate it as ISex/w and IShine/m and then later we’ll add IShine/w?
Although… most of us are quite wordy anyway, I for one have no problem writing the entire name for the sake of newbies.
Out of the androstenols, most people prefer more alpha-nol for “dates”, than beta-nols. Dates being sort of care-free fun, light activities.
Beta-nol is more the stuff of relationships… mental bonding. You’ll learn a lot about each other when you wear it, but necessarily physically.
Because almost ALL women respond positively to “A1”, whereas a much smaller percentage respond positively to androstenone (but when they do – oh boy, watch out!). It’s more of a “sure thing”, and if you have any game at all, you can really work with it.
You definitely can use an heavy alpha-nol product to “soften” androstenone.
Lots of alpha nol and a little androstenone is an old, classic combo that still works.
You mentioned “freshening up” on B-nol earlier. I’d freshen up on a-nol instead when using androstenone. It’s a very fleeting, diffusive molecule that doesn’t stick around as long as -none. (actually, nothing clings to the skin as long as androstenone – it can adhere and leave a residue for days)
Hehe.
We have Instant Sexiness called iSex in the cart, but I think that’d be a turnoff for women. A blunder on my part. Word-wise, men like sex, and women like being sexy.
I’m guessing iSexy or iSexiness, something like that, might be the best abbreviation for Instant Sexiness.
Oh, heck, I don’t know. Maybe I should just spell Sexiness with a Z – IZ/w.
Lots of people like to mix, and Ammo is sort of an “all in one” pheromone cologne.
It’s still very mixable, but there’s even more granularity with other products. Also, many here have their own preferences in cologne.
Interestingly, I’m guessing that if more people tried Ammo here, they’d like it. It has a nice attention garnering edge, and it smells sexy. It’s just that they don’t order it, so they don’t talk about it.
The few forum users who have it seem to like it.
I may also update Ammo at some point to be even more “all in one” that it is now. I’m thinking of moving it more toward like the “Safari” mix.
In fact, I think I may bring out a small line of colognes based on something like that mix. That way you have a base of pheromones that’s fun, attention getting, and drives you to go out and explore, matched with your choice of different designer quality colognes.
Thanks for the info Michael!..I believe I need some IH for those certain occasions at the onset of a relationship or later dates with a woman. I Notice women value very highly having a history with a man. What I mean is I often see women go back with ex-bfs because they have such an intimate history with each other. They know each others deep personal information. Hope that sounds right.
Yessir.
With you, especially, because if I understand it correctly, you want to build meaningful relationships with women, right?
Also, we’re comfortable with the past. Some would say we’re doomed to repeat it.
With women, there’s an almost inordinate trust element that comes from “knowing” someone. It seems like they put a much higher value on having known someone than men do.
That’s why they use a “but I don’t even know you defense”. It’s also why the successful seduction methods out there, such as “The Mystery Method”, use 4 to 9 hours (with an average of something like 7) of getting to know each other to build trust & comfort.
In that method, I don’t think I’d use Instant Honesty for phases A1 to A3 (Attraction), necessarily, but I’d definitely use it for the C phases (comfort).
I was almost going to contradict you, but then I noticed “word-wise”.
iSexy sounds very nice, yes.
iShine and iSexy, I like that.
(Now with or without the capital I? Looks pretty without it)
Correct
Yeah, i finally read the whole mystery method e-book. Honesty sounds great for the comfort phase. Do you think it will work just as well with IO or should IO be left out for getting the whole deep conversation and secret part going on?