Since there’s no more -rone in Androtics’ products (did I get this correct?), what’s the difference between the new and the old A314 formula?
Correct me in my statements if you feel so, I hope I didn’t get the first part wrong.
OK… you must be confusing androsterone with copulins, Deeddy. 
Androtics are out of cops, not androsterone.
I’m sure MHarris and Steve will let us know if they were making major changes to A314. It’s the company’s flagship.
Musk
what about Instant Female Magic. I thought it was based on AndrosteRone?
IFM is based on androstadienone.
Musk
ouch, my bad!
btw, is there any difference between the old “straight in the face” A314 and the new more social version?
I find there are a few subtle, minor differences between the old and the new A314, but nothing too major. I commented on what I feel are the differences last week in my journal, if you’re interested here’s a link to the post: WildFlower's Pheromone Experiences. - #164 by WildFlower
All versions of A314 have about 80% androstenone and 20% tweaking mones. Classic A314, still sold at LS, has 6 additional tweaking mones. The later variants have 16 more last I heard but these amounts seem to change with batches. The classic A314 is more in your face and I suspect may have a higher percentage of androstenone in that “other” 20%. The newer batches are more polite and social. After all, with 16 or so steering mones in 20% you can’t have much more than trace amounts.
I greatly prefer classic A314 for work. It helps me put on a more authoritative face (and smells better too). If I need to mellow it for dating/parties I can always add TAA and/or a-nol.