It’s interesting to note that throughout history (I’m taking a history class right now, we’re in the beginning, I’m sure there will be an exception or two to what I write now..) there have been many leaders of many different empires and some fail terribly, others succeed and form an empire larger than the one before it.
What separates these people? Obviously there are lots of factors (tactical errors, technological advances, strategic advantages, politics, etc…) that went into the wars, but ultimately, it took a leader to organize the people to defend/attack an empire/nation state.
Some small cities/nations have stood up much larger empires. If it weren’t for the leadership, even the advantages the Greeks had against the Persians might not have been used properly, or they might have given up to begin with.
If you were to stand the Greek leaders and Persian leader side by side, you might find that the Greek leaders were more ‘alpha’ than the Persian leader who inherited the throne.
As Tisha said, “They unite and lead those around them to aspire to greatness.”
Ghengis Kahn anyone? He united the Mongolian tribes into a fierce army, but today we don’t consider Mongolia to ever have been a major power. Did he unite those around him? Yes, did he lead them to greatness? Perhaps, temporarily. Korea tribes were united by a person. The Chinese tribes were united as well..In fact, most countries/empires have been formed from scattered tribes. Is unity that critical of a factor?
There are clearly details that might be unknown to me that might sway perspectives.
Would the Chinese leaders be considered alpha or beta for wanting to be isolationist and self-sufficient? The English managed to take their technology and build an entire empire on the advantage of guns. Would that behavior be considered alpha or beta? Beta in that, they weren’t willing to battle the rest of the world without a huge technological advantage, thus weak of heart? Or alpha in that they decided on what they wanted and took it?
Maybe what this shows, more than anything, is that the line between alpha and beta is very fine. More often than not, while it resides in the background, we don’t bring to attention the fact that people can be alpha in some situations and beta in others.
I’d say the bottom line is, can you protect your pack and lead them to prosperity? Some ‘bad boys’ might be able to protect their pack well, but lack the skills to lead them to prosperity. Others might be able to envision a future for their pack, but lack the skills/will to protect their pack on the journey there. Not only do you need a place to go, you need to be able to make it there.