Dbot's Pheromone Journal

Field Reports & Anecdotal Experience Men's Journals
123

I’ve not abandoned my post, I’ve just been studying the shadows.

Over the years, pheromone users have commonly noted that pheromones seem to work better on them when they are not freshly showered. It has also been commonly noted that the effects of bright, atypical pheromone notes seem to be more roundly received when used in conjunction with a nice balanced pheromone signature, such as A314.

I would like to create a base mix that closely approximates the pheromone output of a healthy adult male. Given the current state of hygiene, this alone should provide excellent attraction and respect hits if done correctly. It could, of course, be tweaked to optimize desirable traits, and used in a dosage which would exceed the average individual’s natural pheromone output but still maintain a goodly approximation of the ratios.

I intend to stabilize this mix using tacitus’ long-time favorite fixative, monolaurin, which is reported to help equalize the dispersion rate of pheromone compounds which otherwise display a high level of variance in this trait. It has the added benefits of being good for the skin, and antibacterial enough to practically eliminate on-the-skin conversion.

The mix will then be suitable as a solid base layer on which to test molecules and mixes. This should help to level out some of the variance that is often seen between multiple applications of the same products, and could even help to reduce variance between multiple testers.

A Healthy Male’s Natural Pheromone Ratios

This old news (new to me) comes from nbully’s pheromone blog. Please let me know if you are aware of any newer data, particularly data which includes additional molecules:

Advanced Topics in the Use, Testing, and Combination of Pheromones