Do you realy see that huge difference between IO and IH

Hey Guys,

Do you realy see the difference between IO and IH? For me it’s both almost similar! I think that the betanol is the stronger -nol and has the complete sprectrum of the nol effects and alphanol only has some primary effects of that! So I would not say that IO is much more a icebreaker than IH! It’s only weaker and the trust is missing!

What do you guys think about that? And please don’t answer with the words on the bottle like in almost every threat without a real trial :wink: !

The best way to understand those two molecules is to test them on their own. They each have their own ways of interacting with other molecules and with different types of social situations.

thanks i’ve tested both for a long time! and that was my impression! The question is more if anybody made a similar experience!

I mean testing the molecules on their own, not in consumer mixes like IO and IH, which contain both in varying ratios. They’re quite interesting when used separately.

Also, different people seem to respond more strongly to one nol or the other.

ah thanks! Realy a great idea!

I definitely see a difference. I have IH 2X and as far as communication, I have noticed a slight increase in quantity with it, not so much quality (same as before). That is very helpful for work for example.

However I recieved a togo of IO last week and have replaced IH in my mix with 2X of IO and have seen some pretty drastic results. It’s like IH on steroids in my experience.

For example, I had a meeting with a client last friday and the dude kept talking non stop…I had enough after 15 minutes no lie. Even when we got up and said goodbye he kept prolonging the conversation on and on…my god.

Another example was yesterday evening, when I went to visit a friend at his architecture school. I started talking to this girl (who I’d never met before, but who knew my friend) and again, non stop talking. She proceeded to take out some projects of her and explaining them to me one by one…even my friend started laughing after each “wait, there’s something more I need to show you”.

Plus, she was korean, who in my experience are usually shy at first…and I was wearing 2 drops of A314 and 1 drop of Alter Ego with it. So yeah, noticeable difference as IO at 2 sprays has a much more pronounced effect than 2 sprays of IH 2X to me.

Hey bisso, I think personally that IH is a ‘gateway’ mone to the desired effects of IO…

If someone feels a connection to you because of the ‘quality’ of conversation…they will naturally talk more, which is the effect of IO many seek to get.

With IO by itself, I feel that it is almost a force to say something..anything…do it…quick! Because of this feeling, some people are turned off by their sudden urge and will shut up…Some personalities will talk a mile a minute.

With this said…each has their own benefit…but I personally feel IH is better for getting people to talk to you (with desired effect) because it (in my opinion) directs the signal more towards you and lets conversation flow naturally instead of forcefully. Now, this is not saying I think IO is inferior…just in my opinion not the one to use when you want someone to talk to you more…I feel it is more a mone to add to mixes to lighten things up … especially used with IH.

IO is like “oh he’s that dude that I talked to, we talked all night and had some fun”

IH is like “I really liked our conversation last night, I feel like we clicked on a different level”

For whatever your purposes are, each has its uses.

However…

I may not always use nols, but when I do, I prefer, Instant Honesty. Stay conversational my friends.

Well said sir. WINNING right there.

I agree with what P51 and Septerra have already stated.

I mainly used IH in my mixes, but have had the best results with CTTM2 which is a mix of both the nols with some other steering molecules in there.

So with that in mind, even with my newest mix I went high with IO, and a touch of IH in there so people would want to talk, but would walk away thinking, “wow we connected.” Also, the IO makes me a bit more talkative, so it helped me to bring some of my talents to the forefront and that’s getting people to laugh their asses off.

I do agree with what P51 mentioned, each one do have a different level of connection and quality of conversation, now I believe the user should keep in mind his\her personality when selecting between IH and IO (this in addition to the type of interaction desired):

IO : Will provide the most benefit to an introverted person whose main problem is to start conversation, most introverted individuals do look shy and gloomy and to counter this should lean to IO, IS, CTTM, P83, P78 and the kind.

IH : Will help the extroverted and goofy to be taken a little more seriously, I have friends in this category and love to talk to them but 5 minutes after the conversation everybody is asking what the hell he said, the are fun to be around but nothing else; this type should lean to IH, A314, IG, P75, P80 and others like them.

When combining IO and IH my theory is Introverted 3:1 IO:IH and for extroverted 3:1 IH:IO. This strictly based in my observations while I learned the effects of both product (more recently IO) to use them now to great success, they both rock when used properly.