Nobrain, while you may not have literrally said “you are wrong” you have easily implied as such with just your attitude alone. Similar to when you ask your girlfriend “whats wrong” and she replies “nothing” dispite the fact steam is coming out from her ears.
I think it is clear via your constant messages of implying you will be banned and even your own expectations of being banned, that even though your intentions may be sincere, your people skills and general going abouts with your quest has not been well communicated. Most of your arguments have been done mostly through ignorance and based upon speculation, neither of which is a good thing.
Did you know that, to make chicken breasts bigger than what they are, some manufacturers dips them in a special solution so they take on more water? I could accuse all suppliers for doing this, based purely upon speculation.
I could then, take a purly defencive standpoint denying all thier statements with additional speculations. Even if they were to take you on an all expense paid trip to one of their processing plants, showing no evidence of such an act being conducted, you would simply conclude that they either hid this portion of the plant to you, or some other form of negative speculation. The fact is, to actually prove it is more simple. You goto a local chicken farmer and buy a breast of chicken from them, slaughtered in front of you if necessary. You take a measure of water content per 1cm squared and compare that to the water content of 1cm square of XYZ supplier.
You have simply come here to deny pheromones of any actuall effect with either a agenda against pheromones because you see it as some form negative substance or are simply filled with ignorance and denial of such a substance being real, which IS probably the case since the media like to portray human pheromones as a purely sexual stimulant when the actual results can be as minor as giving a person a more friendly appearance. (Friendliness Vs sexual).
You also appear to selectivly quote people and reject their claims, manipluating what people say and expanding it far beyond what is necessary, just to prove you are right. Want me to prove it? Tisha said she didnt work for AD and she doesnt make a dime, and you have to take a rather simple reply and twist it to the extreme to say that by the very fact of AD offering a ‘points’ system that she has therefore very likely recieve a benifit from AD.
Most ordinary people would clearly see her reply as a simple notion as to meaing “I do not work for AD, and therefore me supporting them is not because I am making money from them as an eployee or partner.”
The fact you have been banned from other sites is clearly from your lack of being able to reason with other people. I don’t think I’ve seen you capable of even agreeing with someone else, for making a valid point and basing an argument from it, you seem to have been only capable of forming arguements against it, even if the statement was a valid one.
I and others have already point out that your actual method of testing pheromones is not actually a test on pheromones at all, but a test for placebo, something we all agree with you on. Most of us know of and about the Placebo affect, we would much rather see you do tests with pheromones that prove the effect of pheromoens, such as spraying a public chair with it, and seeing if people prefer to sit in the chair that has been sprayed vs the one on the otherside of the room.
As per actuall posting your results, While making a thread about it like you have done with this perticular one is fine, but going into other people threads and making a debate about it being a placebo /non pheromone related is just disruptive. In addition what you ahve posted is not fact, its speculation - were you to conduct a proper test it would have been wiser to been more discreet about it by posting the restults as and when you have found them, rather than to cause a debate over speculation, which generally goes along these lines “I believe XYZ does this. I believe XYZ doesnt do that” i.e. 50:50 of mixed opinions
Now I found your topic interesting at first because I have been writing a report on Pherlure for being a scam which, I have mentioned a couple of times but try not to. And in this case, I have yet again had to bring it up but only because I will show a snippit of what I have wrote because it shows a level of fact vs speculation:
For the record, the quote inside the quote = from the fake pheromone site. Also it’s good to point out the fact that because there are lots of fake pheromone products that do not contain pheromones or enough to be effective is something that should be considered in reference to people posting about competitor products and using their products to test.