I think your exhibiting the same bias you are accusing the OP of having here.
If he legitimately sends two bottles, one with phero’s and the other without and asks those ten people to report on results and which bottle has the pheros AND the data comes out completely messy (a near 50% guess rate on which has the pheros and completely inconsistent reports on the pheroeffects) then he proves to some extent that pheros are bullshit.
I don’t feel attacked by his attempt to complete this experiment - I believe that pheros work… I expect that this test will demonstrate that (that being said, because of the sample size it is entirely likely that the results will demonstrate some considerable variability… especially w.r.t. the pheroeffects).