I have a question about these mysterious looking putatives. Do they affect everyone differently depending on their own personal signatures, or do some only work in conjunction with established pheromones. Also, with that said, would anyone like to speak about which putatives are best for generating:
friendliness
lust
openess
attraction
and any other states that seem to have been generated not only in people you interact with, but also within yourself. Thanks!
We don’t know, advanced users are supposed to test them and tell us,
they are putatives after all:
pu·ta·tive
http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/premium.gif
http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png
http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif /ˈpyu
http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png
tə
http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png
tɪv/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciationpyoo-tuh-tiv] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective commonly regarded as such; reputed; supposed: the putative boss of the mob.
[Origin: 1400–50; late ME < LL putātīvus reputed, equiv. to putāt(us) (ptp. of putāre to think, consider, reckon, orig. to clean, prune) + -īvus -ive
http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/graphics/luna/thinsp.png
]
—Related formspu·ta·tive·ly, adverb
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Ah the Putatives. The whole idea behind them is they show promise, molecularly, as a potential pheromone, but have to be researched by experienced pheromone users to actually find out what their usage results might be.
Like most pheromone molecules they would all have secondary affects and although, to some, those affects might be more prevalent than others. An example of this might be user A and B get warm and fuzzy around PXX and user G might get agitated with the same PXX. Then you have user L who doesn’t experience anything and user Y who gets horny from that PXX.
Hence, why Androtics usually only releases the putative and MX series to experienced pheromone users who are willing to share their observations. They also release very little information on the molecule so as not to influence reports.
You can find a Google spread sheet by PheroQuirk that gives users reactions to many of the MX and putatives here:
Google Docs & Spreadsheets - Mix Guide
Confusing isnt it ? 
Stick with the consumer products for a while and get used to the whole mone concept and how it works. Participate in the forum with feedback about you experiences. Then when you feel ready to recognize what kind of reactions your getting try the test mixes and report on them. After those you’ll be more ready for the putatives. Hell I even have a hard time getting a feel for those.
Tisha
Hey Tisha… That new icon avatar thingy is acceptably sexy. Not over the edge sexy, but plenty sexy enough to be willing to dunk you in maple syrup after all… LOL! 
Ah, thanks! That would explain seemingly no one knows anything about them. I’ll take the advice and stick with the ammo and the instant shine for the time being.
Yeah, the instant line is a great set to hang with until you really get the feel for pheros. I also highly recommend instant female magic! Good stuff, bud! Good stuff!
Tater thinks its not exactly the best Tisha icon. Otherwise hed be ticked off at you for stealing the whole syrup thing. 
Well you wanted less sexy and believe me some of the avatars I have are far more sexy then the ones I have used here. I like to change them every week. It pays to have a family member who is a art student. One day I am going to throw one of me in and see if anyone picks up on it. I did it once already and only one person picked up on it. LOL.
Ahh but you know tater I only make biscuits for you.
Snook looks like we will have to go with chocolate syrup it go’s well with MX135 to.
Tisha
Thanks Mountain Man always wondered what putative means