Ok guy ang gals, Im getting ready to make a big purchase of stuff from the store but want to be sure of what Im ordering. Ive done a searching and everyone seems to say different things about the effects of each.
P51 stated earlier that MX and P series mixes are labeled as such for blind testing, I assume to emilinate any placebo effect and keep the mixes more or less controlled.
Would it be wrong to ask what the following do? If its against protocol please say so and I will just man up and order.
Plan on ordering:
P102
p75
p91
p95
TAK
TAA
RONE
NONE (I relaize that this one i beleive is the “give me sex now” mone but wasnt sure if this one would be any different than say TUTH or AMMO.)
So in a nut shell, whats yalls expereince with these and what are the intended uses?
I’ll help give you the gist of them but the complexities of each is up to you to give feedback on! The effects of all these can be different depending on your body chemistry etc. If you start reporting, mention it in calling in your order and maybe you can get the RU discount if you haven’t already
P102 - audio acuity, focous, attractive
p75 - masculinity, try lower dosages first
p91 - grounding, posh attractiveness
p95 - smooth respect like ‘rone’, social respect
TAK - inconclusive so far
TAA - cheerful approachable vibe
RONE - respect, people want to assist you - attractive to younger women
NONE - primal sexual, attractive to older women and sexually comfortable
I had a long post written out, but accidentally clicked a link and lost it all…
The gist of what I said is that I fully agree with p51. The reason the mx’s p’s and experimones are suggested for more experienced users is because they should be tested blind. For our research and findings to be more useful we need to try not to taint our own results.
You say you have searched and found some confliction things that people have said. It is possible that they are just doing different things for different people. Unfortunately by their very nature these experimental mones can be temperamental or confusing especially when there are only a handful of people reporting on them.
Side note: I check out your journal and your reports have been thorough, but you might want to try varying things more, especially if you end up getting all of these new mones. Individual testing is very important as well, taking the time to find your sweet spot and picking apart exactly what effect the mystery molecules have.
I also cant help but notice that you already have four mx’s that you havent done any reporting on. I personally know that mones are addictive and the desire to get everything that this company makes is quite high, but it might save you some money if you worked on testing what you already have or just order a few things. Of course all this is your choice in the end.
Hmm I’m guessing this wasn’t exactly what you wanted to hear.
It doesn’t hurt too much if he knows at a minimum that they do something I figure. Personaly once I get around to testing things I have, I’ve forgotten anything that I may have happened to read before. But I do know that it is supposed to do something… Hate buying things that don’t do anything hehe.
And besides, its great that he wants to invest into trying these things out. Its apart of androtics business model to have new users and have them report on things. They spend money on SEM and google adwords in the hopes that users will stick around…
Personally if you really want to help AD test them totally blind. Even a little info can cause a placebo effect IMO. I do understand that people don’t want to spend money blindly though.
My advice. Buy 3 to-go bottles at a time when your testing the advanced. This way you can pick what interests you. Then cover them all with the same color construction paper so you cant see the labels. Pop them in a hat and mix them up and just pick one and start testing.
This way your trying the products that interest you and you still blind what it is exactly helping to prevent placebo.
Tacarov, no no I appreciate the response. I really havent had much a chance to test out the MX series yet, Ive only done mx440 and posted on the MX forum.
But other than that I do agree, more testing individually might be better, and I do intend to do much more reporting and trying to be more thourough as well. But as I said before lately in the past few weeks its been hard when Im not able to go out often, and I dont want to use too much product at work considering the environment isnt really ideal to test such products. But once in awhile I do as Im sure you can see from my last one or two journal entrys.
But I really do appreciate the response and yes I agree it probably is better to not know the effects and simply blind test them. I have had great results with TAC and P83. Ofcourse my results are different than other posters but as you mentioned they may react differently with different users.
As to what oschrich said, I just want to test them all out, its exciting and I cant wait to test them all! Plus if they are available now, why not try them out while I can get them?
I have fiugured out how much NONE to apply since I have OD once or twice. Right now Im testing MX440 and P83. But as I said tests are few and far between right now. But should pick up again soon.
and finally, I appreciate you looking at previous journal posts, and I will take your advice and try to vary my mixes. (give me a good idea for a new format to test). And oSCHRICH, as always thanks again for your kind words and insight. And thanks tisha =]
Testing totally blind goes against the congruence shit some are touting as the most important of all so how should it be then?
Myself, I’d never buy a product costing as much as these things do without gathering a little info on it first. If I were Donald Trump things could be different. I can assure you, I am not.
