I now have P74 - 1..? and losing track a bit of which of the forum feedback on the more obscure notes so I made this for myself and thought why not share.
it’s not complete - please post to the thread (not as a PM) if there is something I should add. if you’ve been posting here a while, PM me your email and I will give you permission to edit.
I’m a little apprehensive about the current hosting solution. It would be nice to have a stable solution not subject to personal conflicts on the forum, accounts being deleted, someone’s death, etc. I wonder if Jasmin could somehow “officially” host it.
It would be beneficial for there to be some sort of control over it. Backups, prevention of deletion of data, etc. Persons will have different experiences and somehow we need to distil the overall impressions from a lot of anecdotal data.
We also need to guard against the initial poster noting something, then everyone jumping in with “yes, what he said.” This can both suppress valuable differing information from emerging, and artificially inflate the significance of whatever the first responder said. I’m not sure how to get around that one.
all of the above is fair enough. but right now i would (selfishly, for my ends) rather have an organic solution that more or less works than wait for something perfect. there are only a few experienced phero users exploring the putatives who write up their results. the ultimate coordinator of feedback is androtics (via the forum and via other means), so it’s not like a great deal is lost should the sheet break for some reason. all the sheet is doing is saving time doing searches for the more obscure putatives, so i don’t think it makes the problem of biased feedback any worse.
I have (had?) on my to-do list building a similar Excel inventory/effects tracker for my personal use. I had not considered sharing it though. Kudos to you for a community-minded approach. I’d rep you if I could, but the system says I have to spread stuff around first.
MX 172: Sprayable test mix of classic A314, based on MX 102, with 14 pheromones, scent with light neroli. Classic A314 respect vibe softened with a “romance” (not 'none) note.
MX 173: Sprayable test mix of classic A314, based on MX 102, with 15 pheromones, scented with light neroli.
MX 174: 37.5 mcg per spray 4 pheromone mix using women’s pheromones (including Molecule H and Molecule L). Chocolatini base scent.
MX 175: 37.5 mcg of American made human pheromones total per spray, just different ratios of each from MX 174. Chocolatini base scent.
MX 237: MX 169 in a neroli base.
I have tested MX 169 through MX 173. I have since reordered both MX 237 and MX 172.
The only question I have is … is Jasmine or MHarris going to verify the effects of the Ps? If not, who’s the man to step up and say what does what, and then, if it’s true because he said it?
I’m only going to add stuff that has already been posted on the forum (and would ask other editors to do the same). The idea is just to save time searching when you receive a new putative, say. In an ideal world with each new mone I would start from scratch with no initial biases and see what I notice. In practice I don’t have the time to do that for many mones and I am hungry to get the most benefit I can as quickly as possible. Also once one’s attention is drawn to focusing, say, on the group co-ordinating properties of a mone one can notice nuances that wouldn’t have been visible had one’s perception not been primed.
Jasmin has her own sheet that I am guessing has much richer detail than is posted here (since some people report their experiences in person or on the phone).
I’ll filter reports by my personal biased impression of credibility (based on how long they have been around, revealed expertise, track record etc). If we hear different things from two different credible users then we can just note those differences.
A good strategy, PheroQuirk. From someone who knows, this will take a terrific amount of work. I thought it would only take me a few hours. Ha! How wrong was I?
Anyhow, looking forward to the finished result. I’m working on upgrading mine now that P74 and P79 have been upgraded to Pheromone status.
Yes good work PQ! Something like this is badly needed with all the mixes and putatives here! I will try and make updates to P75, P76, P83, etc sometime…
The google spreadsheet copies easily to Excel. I was looking at building an inventory of what I’ve got, and this just saved me a lot of typing.
I just copied the contents of each sheet, put the cursor on the first cell in Excel, and pasted. The first row was offset but I just cut it and pasted it where it should be.
This is an amazing reference guide!! Are people continually adding to it, or is it just kind of sitting there as is? If we could try to get more complete information on some of the mixes and putatives then that would be great! (going to help contribute on a few of the ones that I have, a couple of which have very little info)
I have updated P74 (as well as P93 which was mostly done a few weeks back) on the Spreadsheet now. Yea I agree it is a very useful piece of work as there are so many MXs and putatives around.