Meaning are they pheromones that occur naturally same as A1 or None? Or are they totally different chemicals not naturally produced by humans but discovered to have pheromone like effects?
I know I naturally produce at least some amount of none and rone but do I produce molecules like TAA or P83?
The answers to those questions and more are trade secrets. You’ll need CIA interrogators to pry it out of Mike or Jazz. A few hints from higher up and lots of speculation on these boards but nothing definite…
PSsst…“The Comedian” killed JFK. You gotta tell the press before they find me and do away with me…
is it just me, cuz i did not understand a word the two replies above me said
Translation: Nobody knows or ever will know.
I would stay away from putatives until you get a good handle on the more popular pheros, like the instants, ammo, and a314. They tend to be more inconsistent with results and take more experience to recognize their effects.
It was a watchmen reference.
They are simply molecules are are suspected to have pheromone qualities, but not yet proven.
As far as I know, they are all natural molecules.
Natural molecules–evokes images of teenagers in 3rd world country sweatshops abused for mone harvest. They are stripped nekid, bond and sweat is scraped off of their young flinching bodies. Furthermore, cops, urine and sperm are milked/extracted from them for organic mone formulas. Damn, this is a great idea for a porn flick!
Actually P series are all manufactured in a lab, mainly from petroleum distillates. No natural mones are used nor are animals or human harmed in their creation. We save the damn whales and respect the friggen earth. Go green!
The putatives are not natually occuring in the sense that they are collected from human sweat and urine and sold.
They are duplicated chemicially and are molecularly identical to the natural molecule. Many sources are used to do this like… Proteins, polypeptides, amino acids, plant proteins, Allelochemicals among, animal musks (not to be confused with animal pheromones they dont use those) and other substances.
Each putative is a single molecule. The word putative itself means commonly accepted or assumed. In this case these chemicals compounds are suspected of creating a pheromonal response in humans. They are not proven.
Experimones which you see listed in the store by name like anone anol etc etc… are proven in some in some way whether scientifically or by years of independent research and testing. They are pheromones which is why you see them listed by name.
I would say there are quite a few of the older putatives which I would consider proven now. I think they hold back the name to sort of corner the market on them as well. As long as they keep them in stock thats fine with me. I would rather buy them here then get them directly from the chemical dealer and have to dilute them myself. But if I have to I will LOL ![]()
Tisha