Over the years I read many things here. Things of mystery, and things that were the product of well-meaning but overactive imagination.
I asked questions. I found guesses.
What are the magic mystery molecules in A314 or IH or TUTH? What, maybe 6 steering mones in 314 spray at 500 nanograms each?
Why 2.5 micrograms of anol in ammo but 4 times that in 1 spray of IO? 2.5 can’t do anything? Why use it?
Crickets. Chirp, chirp. And the sound of guessing. It’s magic! Do not ask questions. Burn the witch!
Forensic laboratory graduate chemists. You know who you are. They simply refuse to be active here. I’ve seen them run out of Dodge too often. Xev was one I’ve mentioned.
20 years ago we knew how much of what compounds were on the skin and what they were. They are public info. in Pherin/Erox patents. Andostadienols are not secret compounds. All of the related molecules are found on the skin at about 700 nanograms or less. Less than 10% of that becomes part of the natural mones signature. How much is your natural -enone sig.? Maybe 10 nanograms. Why? Sweat isn’t perfumer’s alcohol. Water and fats in sweat aren’t ideal for diffusion.
See how fast a spray of pure alcohol evaporates from the skin vs. a spray of water.
All of this data is supported by the last 10 years of research using advanced direct vapor collection and desorption analysis. We know the compounds on the skin and in sweat vapor. No male or female scent fingerprint can be proved. The primary thing that affects natural phero output is andrenaline, not testosterone. Alcohol androstenol sprays do affect people. There’s no evidence that any sufficient amount of anol in sweat vaporizes for transmission from one person to another.
These facts were known 10 years before this board launched. Forensic chemists cannot positively indentifiy sweat as male or female on cloth from a crime scene.
If we persist in talk like the natural phero signature as 2 micrograms of androstenone or androstenol, the scientific community will mock this and not participate.
For whatever reason the human nose and brain are highly reactive to compounds like anol, but the body produces little of it. This is the Grand Canyon that separates current, serious academic researchers from the phero hobby. The amounts in commercial sprays are ten times greater or more than natural levels.
If we assume TUTH is better than pure -enone, we must explore why. Otherwise the serious hobbyist has no prayer at making his own 314 spray. He cannot suggest what molecule to change or by what amounts. The current 314 not strong enough? What do your tests show would boost it? Kinda weird because no other vendor claims to use 80% alpha rone in their formula.
People cannot get the version of 314 they want because we cannot even discuss what makes it more or less potent. Hint: 2.5 mcg anol is more powerful than you think.
There is this sort of weird pseudo-alchemy thing that’s sort of unique to this board. It kind of made sense 10 years ago to protect trade secrets. Now it just seems silly. It seems so silly to code the androstenes as putatives when they’re all 20 years old in the literature and for sale elsewhere.
And that reluctance to embrace change, my Androtics friends, brought us to the unfortunate place today. Change or become irrelevant.
It doesn’t make a difference if you are in the gym 9 days a week. Such a tiny amount of pheros vaporize off your skin it doesn’t really matter. There may be such a thing as male copulins (scent compounds structurally similar). That’s what some current research hints at. Differences in male and female skin bacteria. We will never find them if they are not for sale or discussed anywhere online. Get a whiff of them. They are supposedly 100 times more potent than 100 nanograms of -enone.
I am interested in hard, published science. Not living in the past or mumbo jumbo from 1997 about phero sigs., blood type, non-existent data about testosterone, pumping iron and -enone vapor. No disrespect. It’s like veneral disease films from 1966.
I am interested in progress. Keep the legacy posts but understand many of them are junk science by 2018 standards.
I don’t want this to sound negative. I think there is potential here. I am looking for solid technical advice I can’t get elsewhere. I can’t just dial-a-chemist for $2.88 per minute. I know that bnol is a strained axial conformation and I know that anol will autooxidize in air (without bacteria) to androstenone. I don’t know exactly what androsterone oxidizes to. I am not really interested in guessing about it. I’d like to talk to experts who know and skip the guessing and speculation. I don’t want to have to go elsewhere to buy named molecules but I fear that’s what it’s coming to if we stay in a 2005 mindset. 