There are reports that “hormone disruptors”, aka “synthetic pheromones” are triggers for breast cancer, and not to mention testicular cancer. I advise you to do some research on your own before listening to these fools who pretend " they are scientists", when “truthfully” they are salesman at best.
Well it’s not like I’m spraying any on my testicles so I’m probably fine. 
Or we could say your a moron without any cited source thus negating your lies. Dr? Doubtful, but more likely escaped child rapist.
Considering that soda is referred to by the Japanese culture as “cancer in a can”; I’m just wondering if you’ve just appropriated the symbology and decided to be the nasty troll you are and try to bring others down. Fuck off, cobbler.
Speaking of “fools” … “truthfully”… you need to take your own advice before you go shooting off your mouth around here.
If I thought you were actually open to educating yourself on the subject of “synthetic pheromones”, I’d be happy to take my time and attempt to explain it to you but from the charming way you chose to introduce yourself to our community, instead, I’ll leave you with this…
**_______________________________________
There was an old woman,
Who lived in a shoe;
She had so many children,
She didn’t know what to do.
She gave them some broth,
Without any bread;
She whipped them all soundly,
And sent them to bed.
**
You’re next.
Bella
I get paid and laid with the help of these things.
We all die sometime.
I found a picture of DrShoemaker floating around online that may help to give some context here.
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090619184527/wikiality/images/0/0f/Tvdonutbeer.jpg
omg its not synthetic pheromones which causes the trigger… its ‘synthetic hormones’ which is more likely to cause the cancer…
furthermore anything can cause cancer from eating too much red meat to even sleeping with the lights on during the night…
Data - !!! 
!!! Seriously. Made me choke. But!
You should have just copied your sig line, in size 7 font, and in the pink - just because he’s a little (intellectually) bitch.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2011 Aug 30. [Epub ahead of print]
Drug residues and endocrine disruptors in drinking water: Risk for humans?
Touraud E, Roig B, Sumpter JP, Coetsier C.
Source
Ecole des Mines d’Alès, 6 avenue de Clavières, 30319 Alès Cedex, France.
Abstract
The presence of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in the environment raises many questions about risk to the environment and human health. Environmental exposure has been largely studied, providing to date a realistic picture of the degree of contamination of the environment by pharmaceuticals and hormones. Conversely, little information is available regarding human exposure. NSAIDS, carbamazepine, iodinated contrast media, β-blockers, antibiotics have been detected in drinking water, mostly in the range of ng/L. it is questioned if such concentrations may affect human health. Currently, no consensus among the scientific community exists on what risk, if any, pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors pose to human health. Future European research will focus, on one hand, on genotoxic and cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs and, on the other hand, on the induction of genetic resistance by antibiotics. This review does not aim to give a comprehensive overview of human health risk of drug residues and endocrine disruptors in drinking water but rather highlight important topics of discussion.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.
PMID:21885334 PubMed - as supplied by publisher
PS: it is prostate cancer wich is induced by hormones disorders (no proof about “hormones disrupters” yet), NOT testicle genius
And I don’t know if pheromones are even hormones disrupters.
There were also reports in the 70’s of ‘global cooling’, and that by the year 1990, the entire PLANET would be a frozen wasteland.
Strangely, it didn’t happen.
So, how’s the trolling life? Has YouTube gotten so boring for you ‘True Forced Loneliness’ Clowns that you’re attacking the Mones’ site again?
Tsk, tsk.
Oh, by the way… you DO realize that synthetic pheromones are virtually identical to naturally occurring ones, right?
Last I checked, the hormones we produced didn’t give us cancer.
Then again, you may be a smarter man than I, with your amazing sources that you cited… oh WAIT! You didn’t cite any!
Chris
Actually, androstenone might fight against prostate cancer 
J Biol Chem. 2009 Jun 12;284(24):16218-25. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Activation of an olfactory receptor inhibits proliferation of prostate cancer cells.
Neuhaus EM, Zhang W, Gelis L, Deng Y, Noldus J, Hatt H.
Source
Department of Cell Physiology, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. eva.neuhaus@rub.de
Abstract
Olfactory receptors (ORs) are expressed not only in the sensory neurons of the olfactory epithelium, where they detect volatile substances, but also in various other tissues where their potential functions are largely unknown. Here, we report the physiological characterization of human OR51E2, also named prostate-specific G-protein-coupled receptor (PSGR) due to its reported up-regulation in prostate cancer. We identified androstenone derivatives as ligands for the recombinant receptor. PSGR can also be activated with the odorant beta-ionone. Activation of the endogenous receptor in prostate cancer cells by the identified ligands evoked an intracellular Ca2+ increase. Exposure to beta-ionone resulted in the activation of members of the MAPK family and inhibition of cell proliferation. Our data give support to the hypothesis that because PSGR signaling could reduce growth of prostate cancer cells, specific receptor ligands might therefore be potential candidates for prostate cancer treatment.
PMID:19389702 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2713531
Free PMC Article
I can picture it now.
“Baby. what’s that SEXY smelling stuff that you’re wearing?”
“Oh, it’s my anti-prostate cancer spray..”
wink wink, nudge, nudge
Thank you AMMO for helping my lower abdominal region 
Even though I know your a troll I have to respond to this because the ignorance and obvious intention to cause fear of one product irks me.
Hormone disruptor’s or what “scientists” believe are hormone disruptor’s are everywhere in our environment and unavoidable. They are found in the plastic linings of canned goods, plastic food wrappers, detergents, herbicides, hair dyes, cosmetics, cigarette smoke, and auto exhaust—to name just a few sources.
Many medications prescribed by doctors are considered hormone disruptor’s, the birth control pill being number 1 on the list.
Every thing you eat and drink contains hormone disruptor’s because of the pesticides that have leaked into the soil and are now present in any thing you eat thats not organically grown or fed. Even spices have been labeled as HD’s including hops so if you drink beer your screwed.
Most shampoos conditioner deodorant and even lotion contains them as well.
Most make up, perfumes and colognes are made using synthetic chemicals, Many of these ingredients do not need to be listed on the labels, but are known allergens, hormone disruptor’s, and irritants.
Pheromones are naturally secreted by mammals. You cant avoid them. If synthetic pheromones are HD’s then so would naturally secreted pheromones that we inhale from others all day, every day .
That would mean according to your broad statement that exposure to people would be a hormone disruptor’s as well thus possibly cause cancer which we all know is untrue.
In fact studies have shown that all the above HD’s affect our natural pheromone output negatively disrupting natural chemical communication in all mammals. Again they DO NOT show that pheromones in themselves are HD’s but are effected by HD’s .
There is one exception however in a controversial and radical book called Our Stolen Future, Hormonal Chaos which would have us all locked in padded sterile rooms if it held all of the truth.
One could argue that using synthetic mones is replacing what HD’s and EHD’s have destroyed.
I could go on and on however since most likely your an uninformed troll bent on spreading fear and misinformation, I wont bother.
However I wanted members to know that Pheromones are far less dangerous then the plastic container you put in your microwave this morning and then ate out of or the shampoo you used in the shower. They are no more dangerous then the perfume or cologne you use to smell nice.
Toxins are among us people. We have talked about it before in the lounge and theory sections. The problem lies in the sheer number of toxins in all products and foods. Not just in one product we use often. Its the accumulation of all these toxins over time that science believes triggers cancer cells.
Obviously the good DrShoemaker has no ideal that many of the members here have done extensive research on pheromone use and have come to our own conclusions and decisions without the help or influence of those selling them.
Personally for myself I think that yes there are many HD’s out there and I cant avoid them all. But I trade off some thing for others to avoid what I can and still feel safe using products I am not willing to give up because its not just that one product but the accumulation of them. I also detox 4 times a year and I did this before ever using mones not because I use them.
Here is a link were we discussed this subject indirectly
Here are links of information on how HD’s effect pheromone output and signaling
http://library.wur.nl/frontis/chemical_ecology/02_penn.pdf
Here is the place they house many of current studies on DC’s and an explanation of how they affect our hormones.
e.hormone | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
e.hormone | The Hormones : Androgens
Again I have a file of info but I have to work today so I have no time to list them all. The one thing I do agree with from our troll is to research and come to your own conclusions. Dont fall victim to those who pray upon fear.
Tisha
Touche. Advance with another Riposte! Yay, team. We’re all so fucking awesome! And jealousy’s a curse. Go, Mr Cobbler (which if you don’t know is the English word for shoemaker) to the Smartmones store, and buy yourself some charisma. I suggest, for a start, Instant Shine at 100 x strength. We don’t have Smart drugs here, so that for you, is a misnomer.
I can see he’s just cobbled together a post to get a rise out of everyone. You’ve all responded (mostly ) civilly and I’m proud that so many of you felt the need to come to the defense of our beloved community and what we’ve all built here together.
If you’d like I can remove this thread, or at least move it to Lounge.
Up to you guys though.
I vote: move it. easier to ignore in the Lounge.
Thanx, for the consideration, JS.
Keep it, people gave some good info which should be read.
Also..I say keep it cause these troll threads are always good for a laugh 
I do agree that too much mones can mess up neurotransmitter balance and even lead to modification of glial cells. Moreover, it would highly stimulate some areas of brian not normally not utilized. It could be good or bad. Yes, there is a risk that TOO MUCH usage of mones can damage some parts of the brain, but I think, if one uses it very moderately- about two or three times per week - it wouldn’t matter much.
Additionally, things such as cancer, heart disease or brain damage develop over decades, not suddenly, so one needs to use mones CONSTANTLY for a pretty long time to be considered at risk…