To be clear, I like examine and paradox reports. I am saying that due to genetic reasons there is not and never will be a worlds best tester. My results as a white man in FL will not be the same as a black man in Tokyo. Many guests reading this are intimidated by the tone of this thread. They dont want to write or become customers because they feel that as newbies they wont be respected.
I love mones and use them daily.
Japanese do not have the SNP for -enone production. Gorch as a vet can better explain relevance to animal kingdom. There is no best tester. Meaning no disrespect, it is junk science. Most people never read this, which is itself a problem.
Single-nucleotide polymorphism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Junk science - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Polymorphism (biology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I have asked Brian to launch some advanced blind test experiments with placebo controls. And then release the results after an embargo. Then we have proof of testing skill or lack thereof. I have heard “experts” and now vendors say MX297 is like P91 and TAH. 91 and TAH are very different. But if any man here thinks TAH and 91 are the same, I will listen. That is why I don’t trust “experts” without science credentials.
I can spot TAH and P91 at 10 mcg in a blind test. Pretty sure about that one. TAH is the Marilyn Monroe mone. I really doubt Kimba would have been wild for 297 if it was some girly mones. And when I read those two reports I cant tell whether it is just silly or incompetent. Why I really don’t like that vendor. I do not like people who play tricky games. Another dumb ass joke report of his I wasted my time reading. Not P51. 51 is a pretty straight shooter.
Oh you sneaky little Devil: An interesting P83 / P74 / P91 observation
“I used to make up some outrageous claims with some molecules just to see how many others would follow suit. It became kind of a game with some of us.” - S. O.