Unwanted hits... blah.

Quite interesting post overall, as I normally would rather not be so blunt in regards to any faint hint of hypocrisy on this or any board, since hypocrisy is, if you can imagine, nothing but a beast with blatant horns thats fallen out of its own tree.

When in actuality, those horns are slightly cracking through our own stratum corneum, still hidden by the hair follicles that manifest in accordance to our own metaphysical reality. Meaning, there’s hypocrisy in all of us, since it isn’t an intrinsic property. So even though you stole the thoughts and opinions right out of my mind in regards to what is and isn’t justice towards the posters in this thread, diplomacy doesn’t prevail when paired against certain realities which are practiced with obscurantism by nearly all human beings (which in this case, is hypocrisy). The only thing that results is a strut of ‘who gets the last word’, never will it be the realization of the wrong doings that any one poster has done, as you will notice is exactly the case with this thread itself.

The reason I even say any of this, is because hypocrisy in most cases is in the eye of the on-looker, making it a perception more than anything else; again lacking an intrinsic property. So the point of the whole horn with beasts analogy in all of us, is simply that if you look at anything in a certain way, it can always one way or another be perceived as hypocrisy. And even though I believe NMJ was in the wrong in regards to the name calling, I also believe it isn’t justice to label it as hypocriticism. There are too many factors in everyone’s own individualized reality, to perceive certain words and actions as being ‘hypocritical’. So even though she couldn’t say it in words, and mistakenly pulled out the I’m a female I’m misunderstood card (silly NMJ), I do understand what she is trying to say in terms of being misunderstood. We don’t know the realities and all the factors and facets of her situation in her ‘HOLY SH!T GOTTA READ THIS’ thread, so its unfair to associate her own existentialist(I guess if you can even call it that?) realities with her perception of what is and isn’t wrong about benny’s original post. Hypocrisy is anything but black and white, even in most cultures it is believed to be a gray area that can’t be judged by anyone except by one’s deity, Himself.

Don’t get me wrong, as I’ve stated I initially had the same thoughts and opinions as you’ve already posted as to what justice and injustice has been done, but that’s only if you look at the situation superficially. And I was tempted to make a post that would’ve been extremely similar to yours even before you had posted, but again its counter diplomacy to jump so quick. And just like everything else in life, for every one perception we draw from looking at the surface of a situation, there are 10 different variables underneath that surface which distort and change reality.

To make a long story short; I don’t believe that the slight bashing of NMJ, for more than she’s actually done, is warranted.. this doesn’t change the fact that I do strongly believe that NMJ still owes benny an apology via pm for her harsh words, especially since benny is a new user and it may be harder for him to correctly word his experiences. No one on this board deserves to be discouraged from returning by being bashed or judged for their own experiences, since they come here in the first place for advice on how to make pheromones more effective, not on how to act as a human being.

Post more often Dr. Love (and in my journal :stuck_out_tongue:), I have a feeling we’d get along quite nicely. Until then, I bid you adieu.

Is there a FAQ somewhere, some place that we can warn n00bs “Don’t wear Turn Up the Heat in a social setting unless you can live with the idea of a homely older woman hitting on you, and handle it with some grace?”

How come I don’t get to refer to SteveO as ‘Stephen’? Anyone else feel gypped?

That guy owes me money and apparently doesn’t even know how to spell. It’s called spell check doc and you should try using it.:o You can call me Stephen if you’d like, but chances are I wont respond. Jasmosis calls me Steebo because thats what her boy calls me.

The Doc, my deceased mother, and now my girlfriend, because of the docs incessant diatribe now calls me Stephen too, but she adds my middle name to make me insane with lust. Oh great now Lori wants to call me Steebo because “its so adorable!”

Even worse now I need to explain my new avatar photo :open_mouth:

heh, reminds me of my unwanted hit. Stole a friend’s phero signature and then the girl would constantly bump into me in the lineups, (she was behing me in line twice at the local cafe), along with other weird things like talking quickly, smiling lots and more.

note: 2nd time, no pheros on.

You seem even happier than usual Steve, I wish you and Lori the very best in all your future endeavors.

Maybe she can convince you to sell me a bottle of your latest underground ICM experiment! crosses fingers : P

I have been told by April that as soon as I resubmit the recipe she will make it into an MX. Only thing is whether I should submit it with the two newest ingredients.

Unless you noticed a lack of consistency with the latest one, it should theoretically stump the others. In my own experience, I wasn’t too fond of .05b by itself, but haven’t tried compositing the others.

silent chant ‘new ingredients, new ingredients’ !

:slight_smile:

How about 2 verisions of each ICM, one of each with the additional 2 molecules and the others without. Then they could be offered as 2 test packs of 4 mixes each.

I have been using 0.25.1a with the additional 2 molecules for a couple of weeks now, and I like it even more with them, but it’s an awesome mix without them too.

What differences have you noticed with the additional molecules? Did it amplify the self effects? effects on others? make the mix more social? make it more sexual? make women more forward? increase general bonding?

You’re a tease, Mark.

You know I started to say, but then figured that somebody would probably guess the additional 2 molecules (nbully! :roll_eyes: ), so I did not expound on it, because I don’t know whether SteveO would want me to. If he stops by and gives his blessing though, I’ll be happy to.

Awesome it tis! That 25.1a is a bad mofo!!!

Dollars well spent … if only I had gotten ONE freebee, I would have felt the love everyone else seems to have been feeling. :cool: I haven’t gotten a freebee in yearrrrrrrrrrs. :open_mouth:

If the two new 'cules makes it mo betta … GEEZ WEEZ!!! :stuck_out_tongue:

Now back to regular scheduled program … UNWANTED HITS.

SPECIAL NOTE: Always treat EVERYONE special … because that one person you find so very unattractive will always have that ONE hot friend.

Looks like I have developed a reputation of sorts atleast in mark’s eyes :smiley:
I will be happy when I can finally buy that MX. When/If Steveo gives a go-ahead it will be fun to guess the extra components before he actually announces it. That will really help the learning process for a lot of users too I think.

I did try a similar mix as the original P83 based one (although by replacing one molecule by another, and also adding another one, I refer to it as Mix#1 in my blog) and really think that there is something to these ratios that Steveo came up with.