I find this thread fascinating, particularly since my wife and I will be celebrating 11 years of wedded bliss tomorrow. So, if I may, I’d like to offer a thought or two.
Centaur offers, and Carrie seconds “If you want to remain engaged, embodied and afire with your woman, you’d do well to listen to her, be intimate with her, stay open in your own heart, dream with her, and not bail because it seems easier in the short term. Life is rocky; be a friend to have a friend, and most especially if eros is your goal.” Lor says, I assume sarcastically, "husband: its that time…
wife: sigh okay. lets get this overwith.
husband: right on, its your duty!
wife: well get on with it, i have stuff to do."
My interpretation of the juxtaposition of these thoughts is that the man must face his relationship responsibilities and still take responsibility for the wifes response.
Whitehall responds “If low libido is a treatable medical problem and she doesn’t make the effort, then she’s cutting herself a special deal. But if she expects to be supported and share my labor, but freezes me, then we need to renegotiate the terms of the marriage contract.”
Both of these things can be true, at the same time, in the same relationship. Been there. No one is perfect, we are all subject to the vagaries of life stress and hormonal fluctuations; my wife has been fighting hypothyroidism for eight years. Imho, we all need to take our share of responsibilty for the success or failure of our realtionships, particularly if we’ve brought new human life into the world. Dr. Harley (MD, for what its worth) offers some fantastic advice on the marriagebuilders.com site (free) on how men and women can become expert at meeting each others emotional needs in a LTR, advice that has brought solid benefit to my life and marriage.
Yes, I agree, men must follow the advice Centaur advocates; yes, I also agree, women must face their responsibility to meet their husbands/SO emotional needs. And both must do so willingly. There is a world of difference between ‘dignified acquiescence’ and ‘enthusiastic cooperation’, and we all know one from the other when we see it.
Sorry for the rambling post but I hope I’ve offered some help.